Sunday, March 3, 2019

#2599 (3/3) SUNDAY SPECIAL: "Divided Methodists - Will Sexual Colonialism Split the UMC?"

 Mon. 2/25) The Senate will have a roll call voice vote on the Born-Alive Survivors Protection Act, a bill that requires help for all babies born despite going through an abortion. PRAY that every Senator will be held accountable by voters for their vote! TUES. 2/26 - Last night, all but 3 Democrats in the Senate voted to block the bill. May increasingly pro-life voters hold those responsible to account at the next election!


-------------------------------------------

"DIVIDED METHODISTS - WILL SEXUAL COLONIALISM  SPLIT THE UMC?"-  by John Stonestreet and  G. Shane Morris , Breakpoint.org, February 28, 2019; http://www.breakpoint.org/2019/02/breakpoint-divided-methodists/ [AS I SEE ITBelievers/members in Methodist churches (as well as other denominations) in the U.S. themselves need to decide if they will continue to stay with their churches when it moves from Biblical truth to progressive lies. The fact that so many have left the denomination during the past few years should indicate that many are choosing to do so. - Stan]
     For generations, U.S. churches sent missionaries around the world, preaching the Gospel and planting churches in places such as Africa, South America, and Asia. Today, many of the millions of Christians and churches that resulted from those missionary efforts are more biblically faithful than their American forebears. This is especially true of certain denominations and certain issues.

   These daughter-churches overseas, traditional as they are, remain in communion with their now-liberal mother-churches. Which poses a serious challenge. Actually, it would be accurate to say that the central concern of many in these mother churches today is advancing sexual heresy—especially LGBT theology. And it would be accurate to say that the churches they helped to plant, praise God, aren’t budging.

   Many mainline denominations stateside have exerted tremendous pressure on churches overseas to give up the 2,000-year-old understanding of the Bible and morality for the new sexual heresy. In doing so, they’ve been guilty co-conspirators with progressive governmental activists of a kind of ideological colonialism. And then, they act surprised when their actions create serious tensions and even splits in their denominations.

  The tensions in one of the largest Protestant communions in the world, the United Methodist Church, has taken center stage this past week. So far, over 12 million Methodists—almost half of whom live outside the U.S.—have managed to hold together through years of often heated deliberation over sexuality and other issues. That may now change.

  This week, over 800 delegates of the UMC General Conference convened in St. Louis to decide—among other things—whether to reaffirm the denomination’s historical stance on sexuality or to split over the issue. In the end, the Conference rejected two plans that would have accommodated sexual heresy at various levels and instead approved what is called “The Traditional Plan.” By doing so, the UMC chose to uphold marriage as between one man and one woman, and to strengthen disciplinary measures against churches that have departed from historic, biblical teaching on sexuality. Before the convention, many liberal churches threatened to leave the denomination if it took this path. We shall now see whether the Methodists are facing an Atlantic-sized split.

  Thanks mostly to African Methodists, the UMC’s Book of Discipline already defines homosexual behavior as “incompatible with Christian teaching” and forbids openly gay clergy and same-sex “marriages.” That hasn’t stopped many American Methodists from pursuing and blessing LGBT relationships and activity, anyway.

  Despite what you might hear, there is no question about who left who in this situation. Methodism’s biblically-minded founder, John Wesley, called Christians to holiness, but his liberal heirs fly rainbow flags, elect openly lesbian bishops, and  bless abortion clinics.

  And, despite what you might hear, there is no question about where the future of Methodism lies. As NPR reports, membership in U.S. Methodist churches fell by 300,000 between 2014 and 2016. By contrast, the denomination is growing globally. Whether or not Methodism stays united, the future clearly belongs to the traditionalists.

  Still, if liberal churches leave the denomination, it will cost the faithful churches abroad a great deal of financial support. Even so, don’t expect the international churches to cave to the promise of money. Speaking at a breakfast on Saturday, Dr. Jerry Kulah, Dean of theology at the United Methodist University in Liberia, responded to this sort of threat in no uncertain terms: “Africans are not children in need of western enlightenment when it comes to the church’s sexual ethics,” he said. “We do not need to hear a progressive U.S. bishop lecture us about our need to ‘grow up.’” He concluded: “…the vast majority of African United Methodists will never, ever trade Jesus and the truth of the Bible for money.”

  We need to pray for Christians like Dr. Kulah and the faithful members in all denominations who are feeling the pressure of sexual colonialism. Because as important as church unity is, the truth matters far more.

[italics and colored emphasis mine]

RESOURCES
"African United Methodists Won’t Trade Bible for Dollars" - Mark Tooley | Juicyecumenism.com | February 23, 2019; https://juicyecumenism.com/2019/02/23/african-united-methodists-wont-trade-bible-for-dollars/
"United Methodist delegates advance plan to maintain ban on same-sex marriage, LGBT clergy" - Holly Meyer | Tennessean.com | February 25, 2019; https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/religion/2019/02/25/united-methodist-church-general-conference-debate-same-sex-marriage-lgbt-clergy-threat-splitting/2979210002/
"United Methodists’ LGBT Vote Will Reshape the Denomination" - Jeremy Steele | Christianity Today | February 21, 2019;
https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2019/february/united-methodists-lgbt-vote-umc-general-conference-denomina.html-

---------------------------------------



PRAYER MATTERS:
"To clasp the hands in prayer is the beginning of an uprising against the disorder of the world." 
- Karl Barth; "Prayer is inviting God into a seemingly impossible situation and trusting/resting in His love and grace to accomplish His perfect will in His perfect time and for His greatest glory. Intercession is the one of the great privileges AND responsibilities for EVERY believer." - Stan 
------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
    In March, Open Doors is focusing on rebuilding hope for the church in the Middle East. This month, we invite you to pray specific and informed prayers for believers in Iraq and Syria as
we remember our brothers and sisters in these extremely volatile areas.
March 3 | IRAQ - Pray with Father Afram in Baghdad who turned his declining church into a Center of Hope when he realized that Christians were not going out of their homes after work for safety concerns. Now, believers are able to meet together, play games, eat and more.
*Names changed to protect identities

Saturday, March 2, 2019

#2598 (3/2) PRO-LIFE SAT: "Pro-Lifers Look for Closure at Planned Parenthood"

"PRO-LIFERS LOOK FOR CLOSURE AT PLANNED PARENTHOOD" - Tony Perkins, Washington Watch, February 28, 2019; https://www.frc.org/updatearticle/20190228/closure-pp
    If the courts thought they were busy before, they have liberals to thank for their caseloads now. In the last two years, Democrats have sued the Trump administration so often, you'd think they were getting a commission. HHS's announcement on family planning dollars was no different. The second it was filed, the Trump team was ready to head back to what must feel like a second office -- the courts.

  Since the 1980s, pro-lifers have been fighting for a return to the days when family planning programs were not just financially separated from abortion clinics -- but physically too. After all, abortion isn't health care. But for years, the federal government has blurred that line by sending Title X dollars to the same location as some abortion clinics. That is, until last Friday, when HHS announced that groups like Planned Parenthood could only keep their family planning dollars if they moved their abortion services offsite.

  It was a significant move -- one that could cost Leana Wen's group up to $60 million, the single largest drop in Planned Parenthood's taxpayer funding in almost 50 years. But, as the editors at NRO point out, what infuriates Planned Parenthood isn't so much the money (although that's no drop in the taxpayer bucket), "but that the federal government is distinguishing between family planning and abortion" at all.
  "Planned Parenthood wants to be considered a benevolent health-care provider rather than the nation's largest abortion business, and it wants the cachet of the federal government's treating it as a valued and non-controversial partner. Hence the frequent, though long-debunked, claim that abortion makes up a mere 3 percent of the organization's activities. Planned Parenthood's own annual report tells the real tale: Last fiscal year alone, its facilities performed upwards of 332,000 abortion procedures, well over one-third the estimated abortions in the entire country."

  So Wen's organization, along with longtime allies from states like Washington, are fighting the rule: a) because it hates severing any strand of the forced partnership with taxpayers, but also b) because it truly believes abortion is health care (and a lucrative one, at that). Bob Ferguson, the Evergreen State's attorney general, vowed to stop the common-sense rule, repeating the same lies about Planned Parenthood's services as everyone else on the Left. "Rural communities currently have a shortage of health care providers," he told reporters. "This rule will make the shortage even more acute." 

  That is absolutely and unequivocally false. There are thousands of federally-qualified health centers across America -- so many, in fact, that they outnumber Planned Parenthood clinics 20-to-one. They serve eight times more women than Wen's network without the baggage of performing abortions or the scandal of selling baby body parts. "Don't take away my breast and cancer screenings!" the Left protests. But the president can't take away something that never existed. In its last annual report, Americans saw how few "services" the group provided. Their cancer screenings dropped by 45,000 and other care like well-woman exams and prenatal services decreased by 13,000. (Of course, the number of mammograms performed at Planned Parenthood stayed the same: zero.)

  The only "service" Planned Parenthood cares about is abortionAnd it's proving it in states like Illinois, where local clinics are already saying they'd rather sacrifice millions in family planning dollars than give up a violent procedure that more Americans fiercely oppose. If the rule goes into effect in two months, "we won't accept the money," said Julie Lynn, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood of Illinois. Abortion -- not health care -- is their bottom line, which is exactly why they shouldn't be receiving taxpayer money in the first place.

[italics and colored emphasis mine] 

----------------------------------------



PRAYER MATTERS:
"To clasp the hands in prayer is the beginning of an uprising against the disorder of the world." 
- Karl Barth; "Prayer is inviting God into a seemingly impossible situation and trusting/resting in His love and grace to accomplish His perfect will in His perfect time and for His greatest glory. Intercession is the one of the great privileges AND responsibilities for EVERY believer." - Stan 
------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
    In March, Open Doors is focusing on rebuilding hope for the church in the Middle East. This month, we invite you to pray specific and informed prayers for believers in Iraq and Syria as
we remember our brothers and sisters in these extremely volatile areas.
March 2 | SYRIA In several areas of Iraq and Syria, Open Doors is partnering with local churches to help build Centers of Hope that will be a source of aid and community. Pray for the centers planned in Ma’arouneh, Kesab, Mashta, Al Helou and one on the outskirts of Damascus.
*Names changed to protect identities








Friday, March 1, 2019

#2597 (3/1) "The Peace Cross and the Supreme Court - Stripping Symbols of Their Religious Content"

"THE PEACE CROSS AND THE SUPREME COURT - STRIPPING SYMBOLS OF THEIR RELIGIOUS CONTENT" -  by John Stonestreet and Roberto Rivera, Breakpoint.org, March 1, 2019; http://www.breakpoint.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/BP-3-1-2019.jpg
     Last September on BreakPoint, we told you about the constitutional challenge to a World War I memorial in Bladensburg, Maryland, known as the “Peace Cross.” The Cross was erected on private land in 1925 by the American Legion. It was to be a memorial to 49 men from that area who died in the Great War. Their names are listed on the plaque at the base of the monument.

  In 1961, the state assumed control of the land, and therefore responsibility for the memorial’s maintenance. For more than fifty years, no one protested the Cross’s presence on public land or the state paying for its maintenance. But in 2014,  the American Humanist Association challenged the constitutionality of the Peace Cross in federal court. They lost the initial case in Federal District Court, but they prevailed at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. In October, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, and this past Wednesday heard the oral arguments.

  There was a lot at stake. If the American Humanist Association prevails, the implications would reach far beyond this memorial in Maryland to any and all memorials on public land everywhere in the country. Any of them with anything resembling a cross or religious symbol of any kind would be fair game.

  The justices, or at least most of them, seemed aware of the stakes and a bit skeptical that after all this time the Peace Cross suddenly presented an immediate threat to our republic. Still, some of the justices’ comments were less than a ringing endorsement of the place of religion in the public square. Most notably Justice Elena Kagan, who as Solicitor General defended the presence of a cross in the Mojave National Monument, emphasized the historical context. At the time of its erection in 1925, she pointed out, crosses were common in war memorials and were not intended to convey a specific religious message. As she put it, “All the words on the memorial are words about military valor and so forth. So why in a case like that can we not say essentially the religious content has been stripped of this monument?” For Kagan, crosses were “the preeminent symbol for how to memorialize the war dead at that time.”

  In a somewhat ironic twist, it was the lawyer for the American Humanist Association who then insisted that “a large Latin cross can’t be stripped of its religious meaning. I don’t think it needs special words to . . . announce that this is . . . a religious symbol,” he said.

  We should be sincerely grateful that, as The New York Times and the Washington Post both agreed,  a solid majority of the justices seem to be for allowing the Peace Cross to remain on this public land. If the case were to go the other way, we could be looking at a scenario raised by Justice Breyer: wholesale demolition of suspiciously-religious historical monuments across the country, possibly starting with Arlington Cemetery across the Potomac and its hundreds of thousands of crosses.

  But the argument, like the case itself, underscores the allergy to religion that permeates Establishment Clause jurisprudence, especially from the left. To paraphrase the Apostle Paul, apparently the only kind of godliness  that’s “acceptable” these days is one that denies the power thereof. So religious symbols must be, as Justice Kagan put it, “stripped” of “their religious content” if it’s to pass constitutional muster. That would mean that the image of Moses found on the walls of the Supreme Court, must be nothing more than equivalent to the images of Augustus, Hammurabi, John Marshall, and Napoleon — a grouping that would surprise many rabbis, not to mention Moses himself.

  So I pray that the New York Times and the Washington Post are correct in their reading of the justice. But we shouldn’t break out into our best end-zone celebrations just yet. Even a victory in this case could still leave the public square a little more naked.

[italics and colored emphasis mine]

RESOURCES

"Supreme Court seems to seek narrow way to uphold cross that memorializes war dead" Robert Barnes | Washington Post | February 27, 2019;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-balances-history-and-religion-in-deciding-monuments-fate/2019/02/26/24688222-3a0e-11e9-a2cd-307b06d0257b_story.html
"Supreme Court appears inclined to let 40-foot ‘Peace Cross’ stand on public land" - Bill Mears | Fox News | February 27, 2019; https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-appears-inclined-to-let-40-foot-peace-cross-stand-on-public-land
First Liberty website - https://firstliberty.org/

----------------------------------------



PRAYER MATTERS:
"To clasp the hands in prayer is the beginning of an uprising against the disorder of the world." 
- Karl Barth; "Prayer is inviting God into a seemingly impossible situation and trusting/resting in His love and grace to accomplish His perfect will in His perfect time and for His greatest glory. Intercession is the one of the great privileges AND responsibilities for EVERY believer." - Stan 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
    In March, Open Doors is focusing on rebuilding hope for the church in the Middle East. This month, we invite you to pray specific and informed prayers for believers in Iraq and Syria as
we remember our brothers and sisters in these extremely volatile areas.
March 1 | IRAQ Since their displacement by ISIS in 2014, many Christians have returned to their towns and houses over the last 24 months. Pray their homecomings would provide great encouragement and that, through them, non-believers would discover the hope and strength
Jesus brings.
*Names changed to protect identities