Saturday, December 29, 2018

#2535 (12/29) PRO-LIFE SAT: " Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz Remains Funded Despite Shutdown. Here’s Why"

"PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTION BIZ REMAINS FUNDED DESPITE SHUTDOWN. HERE'S WHY" - ;Steven Ertelt, DEC 28, 2018| https://www.lifenews.com/2018/12/28/planned-parenthood-abortion-biz-remains-funded-despite-shutdown-heres-why/  [AS I SEE IT: The final statement in this article - that there is almost nothing that will FULLY defund Planned Parenthood is very discouraging. It's like a cancer that has infected the "body" of our federal budget that is resistant to any significant attacks. SO sad... - Stan]

     One of the most frequent questions and comments we get at LifeNews is a question about why pro-life Republicans never shut down the government to defund Planned Parenthood. As we have explained, shutting down the government doesn’t shut down Planned Parenthood funding. And the current government shutdown over the battle related to securing the border proves that to be the case. While portions of the government are currently “shut down,” the abortion giant continuous receiving taxpayer funds.

Why?   -There are few answers. One is because Planned Parenthood taxpayer funding comes in multiple forms. There isn’t just one line in some government budget saying that Planned Parenthood will receive X number of dollars that can easily be deleted and a magic wand waved to defund Planned Parenthood. There are multiple funding mechanisms under which Planned Parenthood receives tax dollars. Many of those come in the shape of federal grants in family planning or sex education programs. The federal government funds those programs in general and then any eligible medical provider is qualified to apply for funding, as Planned Parenthood aggressively does.

  President Trump is working on rooting out Planned Parenthood funding but it is a difficult process because, again, there is not just one funding line item that can be taken out of a bill to defund Planned Parenthood. Funding rules have to be promulgated and enforced that restrict grants to organizations that kill babies in abortions or that show preference for abstinence education, for example. And in each funding case where the Trump admin is putting those defunding rules in place, Planned Parenthood is taking the Trump administration to court to claim it is unfairly discriminating agaisnt the abortion business when it doles out taxpayer funds under those programs.
  And in these cases, these government programs are funded for future fiscal years, meaning the funding will continue until the fiscal year ends, making it so a temporary short-term government shutdown doesn’t affect the programs.

    When you hear about battles in Congress to defund Planned Parenthood you are generally hearing about a battle only over one of the various ways Planned Parenthood receives taxpayer dollars. That battle typically has to do with Medicaid funding where Planned Parenthood receives reimbursements for providing medical care (i.e. contraception and birth control) for patients under Medicaid. Even if a bill to defund Planned Parenthood, or a continuing resolution or omnibus bill containing language defunding Planned Parenthood, were to be approved and signed by the president, it would still only defund one aspect of Planned Parenthood funding. And such a bill has been short votes in the Senate despite pro-life Republicans repeatedly approving it in the House.

   Getting back to the latest government shutdown, the Medicaid program will remain funded for months (which makes the scare stories in the media false about how recipients supposedly won’t get health care during a government shutdown). As one writer points out, “Most Planned Parenthood funding comes through Medicaid, which has already been appropriated through March.”

The government shutdown has reached the one-week mark and there has been much discussion of what services are not available and which government workers are not getting paid, but one organization has been overlooked. Despite years of Republican efforts aimed at defunding the abortion provider, even shutting down nonessential government services doesn’t appear to have cut off the group from its government money.

The reason that Planned Parenthood continues to get federal checks … is that most of Planned Parenthood’s federal money comes through the Medicaid program. As with most of the federal entitlement programs, Medicaid money continues to flow during the shutdown. Kaiser Health News reports that Medicare and Medicaid are already funded through the second quarter. That would take the health programs through the end of March. A government shutdown is not likely to last beyond March, making it unlikely Planned Parenthood would lose a dime.

   The upshot? Planned Parenthood might lose some money under a long-term shutdown but in a short-term it’s unlikely to lose anything. And federal agencies may “catch up” those entities that were deprived funds during a shutdown, meaning Planned Parenthood could be reimbursed lost funds even if it “loses” funding this Spring under a theoretical long-term government shutdown.

   The only recipe for defunding Planned Parenthood is a pro-life president like President Trump who is willing to defund Planned Parenthood where possible and a pro-life House and Senate with enough votes to accomplish the rest. Even at thatif the courts have their way, there may be no realistic scenario under which the nation’s biggest abortion business doesn’t receive a penny of our tax dollars.

 [italics and colored emphasis mine]

--------------------------------------------

PRAYER MATTERS:
"To clasp the hands in prayer is the beginning of an uprising against the disorder of the world." - Karl Barth; "Prayer is inviting God into a seemingly impossible situation and trusting/resting in His love and grace to accomplish His perfect will in His perfect time and for His greatest glory. Intercession is the one of the great privileges AND responsibilities for EVERY believer." - Stan 

Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
     As you look forward to celebrating the birth of our Savior, persecuted believers in other countries like Somalia, Pakistan and Nigeria are preparing for a time of heightened persecution. This month, join us in praying with the Church around the globe.
December 29 | NIGERIA - Violence from militant groups has caused believers like Ruth untold heartache: “My husband was killed, and my house was burned down,” she says during a trauma care seminar. Pray with Ruth as she draws strength in her grief.
*Names changed to protect identities

STANDING STRONG THROUGH THE STORM - OpenDoorsUSA.org
At my first defense, no one came to my support, but everyone deserted me. May it not be held against them.- 2 Tim. 4;16                                               
SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THOSE WHO SUFFER
The Apostle Paul knew exactly what it was like to be alone, to be deserted by all who called themselves “brothers” and “sisters.” A former colleague who has done considerable travel among the persecuted says, “It is hard to believe that Christians are the largest persecuted group in the world today. But it is even more difficult to believe that this is so seldom mentioned in our gatherings and church services. More Christians know the names of their favorite actors than their fellow believers who are in prison.”
He continues, “With every trip something in my heart breaks as I hear the echoes of suffering:
I remember the echoes of an Egyptian mother as she shared how her young boy was stuck in a haystack because she refused to deny Jesus.
I remember the sounds of weeping as fellow students in Indonesia shared how Sariman, their co-student, was hacked to death.
I remember the cries of anguish as we walked from church to church that was burned to the ground on the island of Lombok.
I remember the tears of Rebecca in Iran as she showed the picture of her father who was stabbed to death for sharing the gospel.
I remember the voice of Pastor Daniel in Vietnam as he shared how he was chained to the ground for six months.
I remember the fear of Grace from Sudan as she shared how her church was attacked and her friend was shot through the head.
Oh, I remember the cries of Caleb in Eritrea as he shared with tears how two dear friends were executed in front of him because of their faith.
And I remember the tears of Joy in the southern Philippines as she shared how her fiancĂ© was shot to death in their church in Mindanao.
But, most all, I remember the deafening sounds of silence every time I return home.
RESPONSE
How can I be silent today? How can I not speak on behalf of those who suffer? How can I desert those that belong to the same body that I belong to and who desperately need the encouragement of my intervention?



     

Friday, December 28, 2018

#2534 (12/28) "The Cure for Republican ‘Shutdown-ophobia’ Is Forceful Messaging on the Wall, Not Surrendering"

"THE CURE FOR REPUBLICAN "SHUTDOWN-OPHOBIA' IS FORCEFUL MESSAGING ON THE WALL, NOT SURRENDERING"Peter Parisi / December 26, 2018 / https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/12/26/the-cure-for-republican-shutdown-ophobia-is-forceful-messaging-on-the-wall-not-surrendering [AS I SEE IT: With the mainstream media constantly trying to emphasize the "sufferings" of people that have resulted from the present government shutdown (which is really far less of a negative thing than they make it out to be), it's easy to forget what is the real issue that has caused it. The TRUTH is that the President's intransigence is only the result of the hypocritical Democratic response. This writer makes some very good points that we need to remember in responding and not reacting to the President's actions. Question: Is national security a priority or is it not? P.S. - Please also note the excerpt from the article I've referenced at the end of this one. It also states the issue clearly. - Stan]
------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
    Supporters of border security can only hope that, over the Christmas recess, Santa gifted congressional Republicans with a crash course in effective messaging on the need for funding for President Donald Trump’s border wall. They will need it when Congress reconvenes Thursday amid the partial government shutdown caused by Democratic intransigence over funding the border barrier.

  The crash course should be taught by psychologists who would start by counseling weak-kneed GOP lawmakers that the best way to overcome a phobia—in this case, “shutdown-ophobia”—is to confront the fear head-on, rather than running away from it. The tutorial in messaging is needed because, until Trump forced their hand, GOP leaders in Congress were poised to throw away the only leverage they have to secure funding for the wall, by agreeing to another continuing budget resolution with almost no money for the wall.  That capitulation would have only ensured the wall would never get funded, much less built, with Democrats—who are indefensibly opposed to border security, their protestations to the contrary notwithstanding—set to retake control of the House next week.

  So, why were congressional Republicans willing to surrender unilaterally, and why did it require Trump’s vow to veto the continuing resolution to inject some much-needed steel into their spines?
It can all be traced back to shutdown-ophobia.
  Psychologists define phobias as “an extreme or irrational fear of, or aversion to, something,” and the Republican leadership’s shutdown-ophobia is nothing if not irrational, given that Republicans scored presidential landslides in 1984 and 1988 despite no fewer than eight government closures during the Reagan administrations alone.
   More recently, Republicans actually added to their House majority and took control of the Senate in the 2014 midterms following a 2013 shutdown of more than two weeks’ duration brought about by Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz’s opposition to Obamacare. So much for the elephant’s memory.

  Despite having a winning hand on the issue of the border wall if it’s messaged properly and consistently, Republican leaders in Congress inexplicably feared the government-shutdown boogeyman more than they feared angering the party’s base, which overwhelmingly supports building the wall.
   Congressional Republicans were about to blink and throw their base under the bus in exchange for, well, nothing, until Trump put his foot down. Democrats were setting the stage for a reprise of 1992, when they prodded President George H.W. Bush to repudiate his “Read my lips; no new taxes” pledge. That as much as Ross Perot’s third-party candidacy ensured that there would be no new term for Bush.

   Capitulation on border wall funding likely would have had that same dispiriting effect on the GOP base, because the wall was and is Trump’s signature issue. Throwing in the towel rightly would have been seen as a betrayal, and it would almost certainly doom any chances Trump has of re-election in 2020.

  But GOP congressional leaders were seemingly paralyzed by shutdown-ophobia, fear that the mainstream media—who, like the Democrats, support open borders—would blame them for the shutdown, even though Democrats’ intransigence is the real cause.

  If the GOP’s overrated K Street consultants were any good at strategy and messaging (they’ve demonstrated time and again they’re not), it would be an easy matter to recast the blame for the shutdown on Democratic unwillingness to defend America’s borders. 

  That brings us back to the need for better messaging. Presidential tweets are insufficient. Trump should request nothing less than TV airtime for a prime-time address to the nation on the issue of border security. Yes, national sovereignty is that important, and that’s precisely how the issue should be cast.
   The president could begin his address—which he should have given weeks ago, before the prior continuing resolution lapsed—by citing a Dec. 11 tweet from Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel:
    In '13 under Obama, all 54 Dems in the Dem Senate voted to:
*double length of border barrier w/ Mexico
*spend $40B on border security
*end diversity visa lottery
*double # of border agents to 40K
*create merit-based visas
    Now that @realDonaldTrump's in office, they're opposed.
   That hypocrisy would put the lie to Senate Democrats’ insistence that they’re not against border security, just against a border wall as a way to achieve it.

  The president should also borrow a tactic from leftist Saul Alinsky’s playbook, “Rules for Radicals”; namely, ridicule, which Alinsky described as “man’s most potent weapon.” Underscore the absurdity of the Democrats, who have never met a spending program they wouldn’t increase, claiming the mantle of budget hawks in arguing we “can’t afford” $5 billion for a border wall. 

  In a $4.4 trillion annual federal budget, $5 billion doesn’t even qualify as a rounding error. It’s significantly less than the $5.89 billion the Treasury says we spent on food stamps in October alone.

  The president should also explain that the one-time cost of building a wall is absolutely dwarfed by how much illegal immigration costs federal, state, and local governments every year. Estimates range from a 2013 tally by The Heritage Foundation of a net cost of  $54 billion a year to a 2017 calculation of $115.9 billion by the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

  Democrats opposed to the wall must be made to answer two simple questions: How many is too many illegal immigrants? And how much is too much for taxpayers to have to pay for their presence here?

  During his address from the Oval Office, Trump should be flanked by Border Patrol agents and border county sheriffs, who overwhelmingly support the wall, and by survivors of the victims of the crimes of illegal immigrants, like the parents of Kate Steinle and Mollie Tibbetts. The president could call on representatives of both groups to make remarks reinforcing his own, as if to say, “If you don’t believe me, believe them.”

  That’s what an effective, compelling messaging strategy would look like if Republican leaders would just overcome their irrational shutdown-ophobia and fight back with all the weapons at their disposal.

 [italics and colored emphasis mine]
------------------------------------------------------------------
"How Compassionate Is the Democrats' Open-Borders Policy?" -  David Limbaugh: Dec 28, 201; https://townhall.com/columnists/davidlimbaugh/2018/12/28/how-compassionate-is-the-democrats-openborders-policy-n2538159
     "... It is axiomatic that a nation cannot exist without borders and border enforcement. This is especially true of America because its uniqueness is in its founding ideas, which are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution."
  " Our patriotic ancestors knew that our freedom tradition depends on adherence to the Constitution and on a citizenry dedicated to ordered liberty -- understanding that freedom is meaningless and ephemeral unless undergirded by the rule of law. They believed that the government's first duty is to protect its citizens from domestic and foreign threats. They disagreed on whether and to what extent we should export our democratic principles but never on whether we should preserve them for ourselves."
   "Conservatives fervently believe in ethnic diversity. America is undeniably -- and gloriously -- an amalgam of countless ethnicities. But we also believe in the assimilation of all ethnicities into a common culture committed to the Constitution and rule of law -- as opposed to a Balkanized society of competing groups that are suspicious and hostile toward one another."
  "This is why the legal path to citizenship and its attendant naturalization process have involved the applicants' pledge of loyalty to this great nation of which they want to become a part."
  "Democrats need to explain whether they still believe in the American system itself and in America's sovereignty -- in its right and duty to enforce its immigration laws, as well as the orderly, controlled system of immigration those laws establish. Let them explain how eviscerating these laws would be in the best interest of America and its citizens in any respect, how flooding our borders with people we can't support or assimilate would help either those immigrants or existing American citizens."
   "If we care about preserving America as the freest, most prosperous and most benevolent nation in the world, then we cannot continue to ignore border security and thwart the rule of law. How compassionate would the world be without America?"

-------------------------------------------

PRAYER MATTERS:

"To clasp the hands in prayer is the beginning of an uprising against the disorder of the world." - Karl Barth; "Prayer is inviting God into a seemingly impossible situation and trusting/resting in His love and grace to accomplish His perfect will in His perfect time and for His greatest glory. Intercession is the one of the great privileges AND responsibilities for EVERY believer." - Stan 

Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
     As you look forward to celebrating the birth of our Savior, persecuted believers in other countries like Somalia, Pakistan and Nigeria are preparing for a time of heightened persecution. This month, join us in praying with the Church around the globe.
December 28 | GUINEA - A young convert, John*, is being threatened by his family and his
village. When his sister tried to warn him about plans against him, she was attacked. Pray for them and for protection over the pastor who led John to Christ; he also is in danger.
*Names changed to protect identities