Monday, August 15, 2011

#113 - Needing A Leader, We Get A Blamer

Courtney Nash - Did you hear about that 16 year-old girl here in Central Florida who died over the weekend possibly from an amoeba she contracted while swimming in a river near her home? As I hope you'll pray for Courtney Nash's family and friends as they deal with her grief,I'd like to make two observations: 1) The suddenness of her death serves as a reminder of how none of us knows the length of our days. We can only pray that through her untimely death, many youth especially will be led to consider how transient life is and will consider their lives from a Biblical and eternal perspective. 2) It is said that at age 14 Courtney signed d an organ donor card. It is said that as a result 7 people have benefited from her life-giving ecision. It makes me wonder how anyone would not consider being an organ donor. [I believe Ive been an organ donor since I first learned to drive 44 years ago.]

May we all begin to pray DAILY that next year's election will yield us a leader who actually has proven strategies to help our economy finally recover from its destructive downturn and who will support a limited governement view that does not shred our Constitution.

Obama's Tour of Denial and Blame/ morningbell@heritage.org (The Heritage Foundation)

It's being billed as a listening tour—a three-state journey across the Midwest where President Barack Obama will hear directly from Americans about the economy and talk about his ideas for job growth. Instead, though, it has the characteristics of a political campaign swing, and the rhetoric the President has brought along for the ride is marked by a desperate effort to blame someone other than himself for America's economic woes.

The President's tour began yesterday in Cannon Falls, Minnesota, where in one breath he pointed his finger at Washington's broken politics and in the next he blamed "a string of bad luck ... a bunch of things taking place over the last six months that were not within our control."

'You had an Arab Spring in the Middle East that promises more democracy and more human rights for people, but it also drove up gas prices -- tough for the economy, a lot of uncertainty. And then you have the situation in Europe, where they're dealing with all sorts of debt challenges, and that washes up on our shores. And you had a tsunami in Japan, and that broke supply chains and created difficulties for the economy all across the globe.'

As much as the President would like to bill his three-state tour as an exhibition in listening or leadership, it's more of an exercise in cognitive dissonance—of blaming everything but his own policies for the reality of America's dire economic straits, rather than taking responsibility for his presidency. That reality has manifested itself in a big way. In every state, a vast majority of Americans see the economy as getting worse, according to a new Gallup poll. The only exception is in Washington, D.C., where taxpayer spending has feathered the nest of the federal government, creating a cushion from the harsh existence of 9.1 percent unemployment, an average duration of unemployment hitting a record high of 40 weeks, and a tepid pace of economic growth that could leave joblessness at permanently high levels. Contrast Obama's results with the promise of his presidency, as articulated in his inaugural address:

'The state of our economy calls for action, bold and swift. And we will act, not only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together.'

Lest America forget, President Obama had two years of a Democrat-controlled Congress to effect that bold and swift action. And boy, did he take action. He and his liberal allies in the House and Senate gave America a $780 billion stimulus that the President promised would save or create 3.5 million jobs by the end of 2010. (He came up 7.3 million jobs shy.) And then there was the 2,700-page behemoth known as Obamacare, the 9,000-Earmark Omnibus Bill, $3.22 trillion in new debt, a $26.1 billion government union bailout in the summer of 2010, the $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program, and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform bill.

Somehow, though, all that action was not enough. So in January, the President used his State of the Union Address to convey to America that he was singularly focused on job creation. And here America sits, seven months later, watching President Obama tour the Midwest delivering that same message, this time calling for piecemeal job creation policies including more stimulus and infrastructure spending, a renewal of the payroll tax cut that was initially passed in December last year, tax credits for companies who hire veterans, a trade deal that he fails to send to Congress yet blames them for not passing, and tax increases on job creators. Though the President calls his ideas new and bold, he's only delivering more of the same tired thinking that has left America in an economic rut.

On top of the spending and debt, the President has promulgated stifling regulation while calling for job-killing tax increases. Meanwhile, his Administration is going out of its way to work against job creation—the National Labor Relations Board has taken action against the Boeing Company for creating jobs in right-to-work South Carolina while also pushing for pro-union policies that harm employers and workers.

Fortunately, the President's way is not the only way. Rather than going back to the Keynesian well and relying on the hand of government, the President and Congress should restrain government and allow entrepreneurs to thrive. That doesn't require a listening tour and placing blame. That requires being a leader and recognizing that the policies of the past two and a half years have not worked—that it's time for a new way, and a new speech.
[bold and italics emphases mine]

1 comment:

  1. This is an interesting perspective. Hungary is an extreme example of this kind of thinking. The government gives welfare (calling it "unemployment")to one particular minority, starting at age 18. The result is that many never seek any kind of employment because their benefits are greater than their earnings would be. Benefits are also handed out based on the number of children in a household, so girls are often encouraged to get pregnant at an early age in order to increase the family's income. These people are stuck in a perpetual lower class with high crime rates and are almost universally discriminated against. Yet much of the blame should be placed at the feet of the government, who keeps them poor through its supposedly "merciful" policies.

    ReplyDelete