Friday, August 31, 2018

#2415 (8/31) "Open Borders Bring a Higher Risk of Disease"

"OPEN BORDERS BRING A HIGHER RISK OF DISEASE"Walter E. Williams / @WE_Williams / August 29, 2018 / https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/08/29/open-borders-bring-a-higher-risk-of-disease/ [AS I SEE IT: Too many are quick to call being concerned about those who come to our country with infectious diseases as "racist." But whatever happened to simply practicing common sense!- Stan]
A Border Patrol agent apprehends a man from Guatemala after he and others illegally crossed into the U.S. border from Mexico in Penitas, Texas, Aug. 15, 2018. (Photo: Adrees Latif/Reuters/Newscom)

    The Immigration and Nationality Act mandates that all immigrants and refugees undergo a medical screening examination to determine whether they have an inadmissible health condition.
    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has technical instructions for medical examination of prospective immigrants in their home countries before they are permitted to enter the U.S. They are screened for communicable and infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, hepatitis, polio, measles, mumps, and HIV. They are also tested for syphilis, gonorrhea, and other sexually transmitted diseases.
    The CDC also has medical screening guidelines for refugees. These screenings are usually performed 30 to 90 days after refugees arrive in the United States.

But what about people who enter our country illegally? The CDC specifically cites the possibility of the cross-border movement of HIV, measles, pertussis, rubella, rabies, hepatitis A, influenza, tuberculosis, shigellosis, and syphilis. Chris Cabrera, a Border Patrol agent in South Texas, warned: “What’s coming over into the U.S. could harm everyone. We are starting to see scabies, chickenpox, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, and different viruses.”

Some of the youngsters illegally entering our country are known to be carrying lice and suffering from various illnesses. Because there have been no medical examinations of undocumented immigrants, we have no idea how many are carrying infectious diseases that might endanger American children when these immigrants enter schools across our nation.

According to the CDC, in most industrialized countries, the number of cases of tuberculosis and the number of deaths caused by TB steadily declined during the 100 years prior to the mid-1980s. Since the 80s, immigrants have reversed this downward trend in countries that have had substantial levels of immigration from areas where the disease is prevalent.
    In 2002, the CDC said: “Today, the proportion of immigrants among persons reported as having TB exceeds 50 percent in several European countries, including Denmark, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. A similar proportion has been predicted for the United States.”

The number of active TB cases among American-born citizens declined from an estimated 17,725 in 1986 to 3,201 in 2015. That was an 80 percent drop. Data reported to the National Tuberculosis Surveillance System show that the TB incidence among foreign-born people in the United States (15.1 cases per 100,000) is approximately 13 times the incidence among U.S.-born people (1.2 cases per 100,000).
    Those statistics refer to immigrants who are legally in the U.S. There is no way for us to know the incidence of tuberculosis and other diseases carried by those who are in our country illegally and hence not subject to medical examination.

    This public health issue is ignored by all those Americans championing sanctuary cities. The public health issue is also ignored by Americans clamoring for open borders, and that includes many of my libertarian friends.

By the way, in the late 19th century and early 20th century, when masses of European immigrants were trying to enter our country, those with dangerous diseases were turned back from Ellis Island. Americans hadn’t “progressed” to the point of thinking that anyone in the world has a legal right to live in America. Neither did they think that it was cruel or racist to take measures to prevent our fellow Americans from catching diseases from foreigners.

But aside from diseases, there is the greater threat of welcoming to our shores people who have utter contempt for Western values and want to import anti-Western values to our country, such as genital mutilation, honor killings, and the oppression of women.
    Many libertarian types make the argument that we would benefit from open borders when it comes to both people and goods. That vision ignores the important fact that when we import, say, tomatoes from Mexico, as opposed to people, to the U.S., they are not going to demand that we supply them with welfare benefits.

The bottom line is that we Americans have a right to decide who enters our country and under what conditions. If we forgo that right, we cease to be a sovereign nation. But that may not be important to some Americans.

[italics and colored emhasis mine]

Walter E. Williams is a columnist for The Daily Signal and a professor of economics at George Mason University.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 31 | VIETNAM - Four families of Hmong Christian believers were attacked by
their village chief and other villagers in their northwest province. Please pray for this group of believers as they continue to stand strong in the wake of the brutal attack.
*Names changed to protect identities

Thursday, August 30, 2018

#2414 (8/30) "Undocumented Immigrant’ Is a Made-Up Term That Ignores the Law"

"'UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT' IS A MADE-UP TERM THAT IGNORES THE LAW"Hans von Spakovsky / @HvonSpakovsky / July 30, 2018 / https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/07/30/undocumented-immigrant-is-a-made-up-term-that-ignores-the-law
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
    The news media is reporting that an internal email at the Justice Department has reminded its lawyers that the legally correct term they should be using in their briefs is “illegal alien,” not the euphemism “undocumented immigrant.” The Justice Department leadership is correct. Illegal alien is the correct legal term that should be used.

“Undocumented immigrant” is a politically correct, made-up term adopted by pro-illegal alien advocacy groups and liberal media outlets to obscure the fact that such aliens have violated U.S. immigration law and are in the country illegally.

Precision in the law is a vital principle, since the exact words used in statutes, regulations, contracts, guidance documents, and policy statements can significantly affect how they are applied and interpreted. If we are going to discuss and debate the issue of immigration and what our public policy should be, we should at least use accurate, precise terms, and talk about, for example, legal aliens vs. illegal aliens.

     Government lawyers in particular have an obligation to use the correct language of the federal statutes they are sworn to uphold and enforce. Federal immigration law uses the term “illegal alien.” For example, 8 U.S.C. §1365 is a provision that deals with a reimbursement program the federal government has for states that are incarcerating illegal aliens. Its very title refers to “illegal aliens,” and that term is used in the statute itself, which defines an illegal alien as anyone “who is in the United States unlawfully.”
    “Alien”—rather than “immigrant”—is the correct legal term, since “alien” is defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101 (a)(3) as “any person not a citizen or national of the United States.” 
   The Supreme Court, which has decided numerous cases involving federal immigration law, also uses the correct, precise legal term of “illegal alien.”
   In 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen pointed this out in his decision granting an injunction against the implementation of President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, the so-called DAPA program. As Hanen said in a footnote:"The Court also understands that there is a certain segment of the population that finds the phrase ‘illegal alien’ offensive. The court uses this term because it is the term used by the Supreme Court in its latest pronouncement pertaining to this area of the law. See Arizona v. U.S., 132 S. Ct. 2492 (2012)." Hanen was, of course, correct in his assessment. The Supreme Court used the term “illegal alien” not only in that case, but in numerous prior decisions, some of which are cited in Arizona v. U.S.

Under federal law, any individual in this country who is not a citizen is an alien. And any alien who is here without permission is here illegally. End of story.

    But of course, the propaganda war in the public arena cares little for facts and actual statutory language. Pro-illegal alien groups, politicians who push “sanctuary” policies and open borders, and protesters who want to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, want to persuade the American public that those here illegally are no different than those who followed the rules to come here lawfully. Using terms like “undocumented immigrant” is intended to blur and extinguish the line between legal and illegal immigration.

Advocates for illegal aliens want to stifle debate by making the false claim that if you are against “undocumented immigrants”—aka illegal aliens—you must be a racist, a nativist, or someone who hates all immigrants.
    That is false and shameful demagoguery of the worst kind. The United States is the most generous country in the world when it comes to legal immigration. We take in more than 1 million legal immigrants a year—more than any other country in the world. But support for legal immigration doesn’t mean we must also support illegal immigration. In fact, we have an obligation to prevent illegal aliens from breaking our laws and entering our country surreptitiously.

    The term “illegal alien” is neither dehumanizing, nor demeaning. It is the precise legal term for those whose status in this country is unlawful.

President Ronald Reagan once said that “a nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation.”

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 30 | INDONESIA - Trinity, one of the child victims in the church bombing last year, is
healing wonderfully. Her father recently sent us a video clip of her strumming the guitar and singing, “I am happy to be God’s child.” Continue to pray for Trinity’s healing!
*Names changed to protect identities 

Wednesday, August 29, 2018

#2413 (8/29) “'Gosnell' Movie Trailer Released, Horror Story of Abortionist Showing in 750 Theaters in October"

“'GOSNELL' MOVIE TRAILER RELEASED, HORROR STORY OF ABORTIONIST SHOWING IN 750 THEATERS IN OCTOBER" Seven Erelt, Aug 15, 2018  | http://www.lifenews.com/2018/08/15/gosnell-movie-trailer-released-horror-story-of-abortionist-showing-in-750-theaters-in-october/ [AS I SEE IT: It's amazing  how many people go to see a movie based on some made-up horror story. Now here comes a film that is rooted in truth, in what really happened. That makes this story even more horrific. I do hope this film will draw the needed attention and that it will result in more people demanding more oversight as to what abortion killing centers do on a regular basis.  Please make plans yourself to see it when it is  released in October. - Stan]
    The trailer for the new movie “Gosnell” has just been released and it will surely make watchers want to see the intense new film. [Please go to the weblink for this article to view the movie trailer; most powerful!]

The feature film, “Gosnell,” which is scheduled for release in October, unmasks the shocking true story of the investigation and trial of Kermit Gosnell, a man who performed countless illegal, late-term abortions and murdered several born children as well.

    He is the abortion practitioner who killed babies in live-birth abortions that were more akin to infanticide than abortion. The media virtually ignored Kermit Gosnell until the pro-life movement launched a concerned effort to call them out on their bias during the early stages of his trial for murder.

Now, Gosnell is in prison, having been convicted of murder in the deaths of multiple babies, though he was accused of killing thousands of viable babies. Still, one report from Gallup showed a large percentage of Americans still have no idea who Gosnell is and what he did.

Gosnell: The Trial of America’s Biggest Serial Killer opens nationwide on October 12 and stars Dean Cain as the detective who put Gosnell behind bars.

Movie executive director Phelim McAleer previously told LifeNews that, despite the grisly, horrific nature of the case, what astounded him the most was the lack of a media presence covering Gosnell’s trial. “This is one of the biggest stories I’ve ever seen, I’ve ever heard about, and there was no coverage at all,” he said.

    After the events of Gosnell’s case concluded, McAleer and his wife, fellow journalist and documentarian Ann McElhinney, decided to take matters into their own hands. 
    “I just assumed then once he [Gosnell] was convicted, that there was going to be a mega movie, because why wouldn’t you make a movie out of this?” McAleer said. “So I waited and waited and I realized, wow, no one’s making a movie out of this? That’s because they don’t want—Hollywood doesn’t want to touch this story or cover this story. So, if they’re not going to do it, then I should do it. We’ve done this before; we’ve been telling stories all of our lives. We’ll just make a movie, and we did.”

Once the idea was set, the next major task was to allocate money to make the film. McAleer decided to crowdfund, a strategy he has used for previous films. He and his wife initially went to Kickstarter to fundraise, but they faced censorship on that site. “Kickstarter said ‘yeah, you can [fundraise] here, but you have to change the description of your project,” McAleer said.
    McAleer was asked to remove terms like “murder,” “murdering babies,” and “stabbing babies” from the description of their project, because the words were deemed offensive to Kickstarter’s community values. Gosnell was, in fact, convicted of murdering three newborn babies, and witnesses who testified at the trial said he killed them by stabbing the backs of the babies’ necks with scissors. “I don’t want to be part of a community that has standards that force you to lie,” McAleer said.
    McAleer and McElhinney then pulled out of Kickstarter and proceeded to fundraise via Indiegogo, a similar fundraising website. Their campaign went well, to say the least. Nearly 30,000 people raised $2.3 million in 45 days for “Gosnell,” which broke the website’s fundraising record. Even though McAleer and his wife made Indiegogo history, there was little fanfare.
   “No mainstream media has ever written a story on us. When they write nice puffy stories about crowdfunding, they seem to forget to include us. And you know, it’s a movie that exposes them, shows them off for the agenda-driven PACs that they are. Our movie is saying the things that they don’t want to talk about—the negative side of abortion and how the media covers things up,” he said.  

“Gosnell” features some A-list names, including director Nick Searcy (“The Shape of Water”) [this was a movie nominated for Best Picture from last year] and Dean Cain (“Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman”). However, some actors were reluctant to accept roles, and after being cast, some stepped down.

“So Hollywood didn’t want to touch this film…You know Hollywood, they give themselves awards for bravery, but they’re not that brave, McAleer said.

The movie is scheduled for release Friday, Oct. 12. For more details, visit gosnellmovie.com.

[italics and colored emphasis mine]

Tuesday, August 28, 2018

#2412 (8/28) "The McCain Conundrum"

"The McCain Conundrum" Mark Davis : Aug 27, 2018 https://townhall.com/columnists/markdavis/2018/08/27/the-mccain-conundrum-n2513273 [AS I SEE IT: Rarely has there been a more appropriate word than "connundrum" when  describing how I regard the late Senator McCain. There is NO question that his service to his country in the military is to be applauded. However, his "service" to his country in Congress raises many questions for I and others who call ourselves conservative in political philosophy. While he promoted a reputation of being a "maverick" - something that usually is a good thing when it describes someone who is not afraid to go against wrong-headed policies of his own group, in the Senator's case it usually meant going against good conservative policies. Because of that he was too often a champion of liberal policies that did not serve this country well. Doing this made him not  only popular with liberals but accordingly with most in the mainstream media. And so the bottom line: let's agree he served his country well in the military but was less than admirable in his service as a Senator. - Stan]
    The passing of one of the most significant political figures of our lives should not plunge us into a sour soup of competing grudges. But alas, welcome to 2018, where shallow immaturities can poison the occasions that should bring out our best instincts.         

The death of John McCain should first and foremost attract appreciation for a man who served the nation he loved with such distinction. This does not forbid frank discussion of his complex politics or the tone of his final years; but one might think those things would be subtly attached to higher reactive instincts.           

What we have been treated to is a barrage of juvenile hyperreactivity fueled by the blazing furnace of today’s politics.  While McCain’s contemporaries from across the political spectrum offered uplifting measures of praise, the mudpits of Twitter fired up with a wide display of ugly opportunism.            

As far back as his 2008 nomination and his 2000 GOP primary campaign, plenty of Republicans have expressed dismay at his inconsistent conservatism.  I know; I have often been one of them.  But in my daily life of radio talk shows, I have often told complaining callers that this is the choice made by the only constituency with a voice in the matter: Arizona voters.  Not every state elevates the staunchest conservatives.  Some states have given us Republicans more liberal than Southern Democrats used to be.            

Most Republicans were satisfied to unite behind McCain as we all tried to prevent the Obama presidency in 2008.  The ensuing years contained chapters of the Senator fighting for some conservative goals and thwarting others.  Reactions followed accordingly; he was far from the only Republican offering a mixed bag of political instincts.            

But the ascendancy of Trump changed America, and it changed McCain.  His famous graciousness ran empty for the man who plowed through the opposition to show voters a new energy and bolder focus toward goals Republicans had craved for decades.  In the opening months of the Trump presidency, McCain made clear his contempt for the man, distaste so broad and engulfing that it included the millions who had elected him.            
     This is no small slight, and that is why it is not wrong to include observations about it in remembrances of him.  But spurred by the adolescence and anonymity evident in countless social media accounts, what gathered was a wave of smears that rose to a level of viciousness that was disillusioning even by today’s standards.            

    As unfortunate as it is for ugly people to say ugly things, there was additional dispiriting news to be found in the reaction to McCain’s passing, and it actually came from among those praising him. While the vast majority of accolades carried proper tones and motivations, it became clear that some tributes were magnified, if not wholly inspired, by McCain’s most familiar habit of his last two years— trashing Trump.            
    McCain was always one of the left’s favorite Republicans, for the plain reason that he shared some of their views.  Unwilling to back tough immigration laws and the repeal of Obamacare, he always enjoyed moments of praise from Democrats.  Throw in his anti-Trump vitriol, and he became a handy hero to Democrats wishing to appear bipartisan by finding a Republican they did not despise.            

But some of the loudest hurrahs came from Republicans who shared his loathing of Trump.  In the Never Trump tree house, his heroism as a patriot, veteran and POW was matched if not surpassed by his willingness to give Trump hell.  In these days that should be filled with unifying appreciation of an American original, we get playground hoots of joy that Barack Obama will be at the funeral while Donald Trump will not.           

A word about funerals: there was a reason President Trump did not attend the services for Barbara Bush: she hated his guts.  At the McCain funeral, the eulogies to be offered by Obama, his rival in 2008, and George W. Bush, his primary rival in 2000, will be filled with meaning and sincere emotion. They will also reveal the fact that McCain got over those losses far more easily than the 2016 Trump win.           

This is all fine.  There is etiquette to funeral attendance, and some of it involves the avoidance of discomfort and awkwardness.  Many will suggest that the tone was set by Trump’s dumb line about preferring “people who weren’t captured.”  But as unfortunate as that was, does it rise to the level of serious repudiation repeated by McCain on countless occasions?  In one 2017 speech alone, he attacked the America-first conservatism of Trump and millions of voters as “unpatriotic,” “half-baked spurious nationalism” that “would rather find scapegoats than solve problems.”            
    This was catnip for Trump-hating Republicans who now lament that we have lost a “truth-teller.”  What they will miss most is the reputational cover he gave to the various loudmouths and backbenchers taking potshots at the President and offering his agreement as validation.            
    This is all just sad.  This period of remembrance should be about the whole man and his whole life, a unique story just short of 82 years, filled with examples of devotion to duty, honor, country and family.  While the coda of his composition was filled with passages that ignite our national passions of the moment, the days to come should be filled with reminders of larger concepts:  his service, sacrifice and courage.  

[italics and colored emphasis mine]

Monday, August 27, 2018

#2411 (8/27) "Mollie Tibbetts Case Shows Cost of Not Enforcing Immigration Laws"

"MOLLIE TIBBETTS CASE SHOWS  COST OF NOT ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS" - Katrina Trinko / @KatrinaTrinko / Daniel Davis / @JDaniel_Davis / August 22, 2018 / https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/08/22/mollie-tibbetts-case-shows-cost-of-not-enforcing-immigration-laws/
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
    This is a lightly edited transcript of an interview on the Aug. 23 Daily Signal podcast. 

President Donald Trump: "You heard about today with the illegal alien coming in, very sadly, from Mexico, and you saw what happened to that incredible, beautiful young woman. It should have never happened. Illegally in our country. We’ve had a huge impact, but the laws are so bad. The immigration laws are such a disgrace."

Katrina Trinko: That was President Trump Tuesday night at a rally, speaking about Mollie Tibbetts, the missing college student whose case has gained nationwide coverage. On Tuesday, it was announced that Cristhian Bahena Rivera, a 24-year-old who is reportedly an illegal immigrant, was being charged for first-degree murder in the Tibbetts case.
    Joining us to discuss is Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Hans, this case has brought renewed attention to the issue of illegal immigration and crime. Does the U.S. need to change policy to deal with this issue?

von Spakovsky: The answer is yes. What’s so sad about what happened to Mollie Tibbetts is that she’s one of many Americans who have lost their lives because of our lack of enforcement of our immigration laws.
    I’ll give you a quick example of what I mean. In February of this year, the Texas Department of Public Safety released a study. What they did is they took a look at all of the aliens who were in state and county jails all over Texas from 2011 through 2018. Two-thirds of them are here illegally. They found that those individuals had been charged with 650,000 criminal offenses, including 600 murders.
   There are literally hundreds of victims who would be alive today in Texas if those illegal aliens had been stopped at the border or, when they were caught inside the United States, had been quickly deported. Sanctuary cities who provide sanctuaries for illegal aliens, including those who are arrested and put in local jails, are just creating sanctuaries for criminals.

Daniel Davis: We don’t often hear about those cases where folks are killed by those who are here illegally. We knew about Kate Steinle and some others that made some headlines. Looking at this case, tell us what we know about the guy who killed Mollie Tibbetts.

von Spakovsky: Well, supposedly, he hadn’t been arrested before. His local employer claims that they checked the E-Verify system and that he cleared. We’ll have to see if that’s really true or whether that’s simply a claim that they’re making. It’s hard for me to believe that there weren’t a lot of people wherever he lived and worked that didn’t realize that he was here illegally. Protecting his status meant that he could become a criminal and victimize this poor family.
    Yeah, you’re right. We only hear about these cases occasionally, but there’s an organization called The Remembrance Project that is made up of many, many families whose family members have been the victims of illegal aliens who are here. In other cases, cases where they were previously arrested, convicted of local crimes, and then let loose instead of being deported from the country. And every single one of those individuals would be alive today if that alien were not in the country.

Trinko: If someone tries to come to the United States legally, are they screened? Would local crimes that they commit in the past be on the authority’s radar?

von Spakovsky: Well, it depends. For example, what’s been in the news lately, a lot of course, is the DACA program. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program that President [Barack] Obama put up. The background was not verified and checked by the Department of Homeland Security of the vast majority of those DACA beneficiaries when they were given lawful status by the Obama administration. In fact, DHS had a program of only occasionally randomly checking. So we actually don’t know about the criminal backgrounds of 99 percent of the people who got DACA status and the ability to stay in the country.
    We do know that thousands of them have since been discovered to have criminal backgrounds, who have committed criminal violations of the law, including, I think, at least 2,000 DACA beneficiaries who’ve been thrown out of the program because of their gang affiliation, including with MS-13, which is one of the most dangerous criminal gangs in the world.

Davis: In this case, do you expect the murderer to be charged with anything other than murder? Do you think he’ll get anything extra for being here illegally?

von Spakovsky: Well, he’s been charged with first-degree murder. We don’t know what the end result of that would be, but clearly what needs to happen is hopefully he will be convicted and will never, ever be let out of prison or hopefully will get the death penalty, one or the other, so that he’s never on the streets again where he can endanger other families and other Americans.

Trinko: Are there other components of immigration policy that this shows we need to address? I’ve seen one of the points made on Twitter is that this shows this is not just a border state issue. Iowa obviously doesn’t share a border with Mexico or any other countries. What does this say about the broader problem?

von Spakovsky: In fact, we not only have to secure our borders, but we have to enhance our interior enforcement. It’s the interior enforcement that all these sanctuary cities all over the country are trying to interfere with and obstruct. ICE needs to be able to find particularly criminal aliens all over the country and get them out of the country.
    When we have places like Philadelphia saying that we’re not gonna provide you any information about illegal aliens who we arrest, what are they doing? They’re protecting criminals to the detriment of the citizens and residents of the city.

The Daily Signal podcast is available on Ricochet, iTunes, SoundCloud, Google Play, or Stitcher. All of our podcasts can be found at DailySignal.com/podcasts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 27 | NIGERIA Elizabeth Paul was expelled from school for sharing about Christ
on social media. Pray that God would encourage and strengthen her as she walks through these trials.
*Names changed to protect identities

Sunday, August 26, 2018

#2410 (8/26) SUNDAY SPECIAL: " One Race, One Faith - Reconciliation and Revival"

"ONE RACEL ONE FAITH - RECONCILIATION AND REVIVAL" by Eric Metaxas and Roberto Rivera, Breakpoint.org, August 24, 2018; http://www.breakpoint.org/2018/08/breakpoint-one-race-one-faith/
     It’ll be a tall climb to bring about racial reconciliation—even in the Church. But one group has its hiking shoes on.

On Thanksgiving night in 1915, William J. Simmons, a former Methodist minister, and approximately 15 other men climbed Stone Mountain outside of Atlanta, set a cross on fire, and proclaimed the birth of the revived Ku Klux Klan. To reinforce the connection between the revived Klan and Christianity, they placed an altar beside the burning cross, and on the altar they placed a sword and a Bible.

It would be nice to tell you that this attempt to link the Klan to Christianity was an aberration, but that would be a lie. The ties between preachers, churches, and the Klan were deep and widespread. An infamous 1922 photo shows a group of klansmen in full regalia standing at the front of a church under a sign that reads “Jesus Saves.”

It’s a shameful story, which makes me all the more happy to tell you about a group of Christians who are seeking to write a new story—one more in keeping with the Lord’s intentions for his Church.
     On August 25 [yesterday], thousands of Christians will climb to the top of Stone Mountain with a very different purpose in mind. Led by Garland Hunt, the senior pastor of the Father’s House in Norcross, Georgia, and Billy Humphrey of the International House of Prayer, they will gather “to renounce racism and dead religion, and covenant together to move forward through reconciliation and revival.” The organization behind the event is OneRace, which, according to its website, is “focused on engaging millennials” and on “confronting the historic division between black and white.”

Now, there’s been no shortage of efforts to engage millennials and to promote racial reconciliation. But there’s reason to hope that OneRace may succeed. Long before, and hopefully, long after August 25, tens of thousands of Christians of all races, ethnicities, and denominational affiliations gathered in small groups to pray.
    Obviously, we believe that this kind of prayer can help to bring about the revival OneRace and other Christians seek. Any endeavor undertaken in the name of Jesus must have prayer at its heart.
    But this emphasis on prayer also aids in the building of relationships across the lines that have previously divided Christians. Their goal is “To inspire 100,000 cross-cultural relationships and 1,000,000 acts of kindness.”

As a BreakPoint colleague has noted, for most, if not all, of American history, white and black Christians have traveled on parallel but separate tracks despite their shared faith. Coming together to pray is a way getting people, to stretch the metaphor to the breaking point, to ride on the same train.

The other grounds for hope is that organizers are realistic about the task ahead of them. As John Stonestreet said yesterday on The Point, “True racial reconciliation is hard, and fraught with political, theological, and personal landmines.”
    As Garland Hunt told CBN, the process will make people feel uncomfortable at times. Navigating a potential minefield usually does. But we have no choice. If the people who bear the name of the one who with His blood, purchased for God . . . “men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation,” can’t pull off being one race, what hope is there for the rest of the world?

Christians are called to run into the cultural mess and not away from it. We are at our best when we respond to brokenness with truth and grace, starting with our own. That’s why OneRace is an effort worth knowing about and supporting—or even replicating in your community and state.
Because if we don’t do this vital work, who will?

You can find out more about One Race at OneRaceMovement.org. Or of course, come to BreakPoint.org and we’ll link you to it.

 [italics and colored emphasis mine]
\
RESOURCESWhether you’re at Stone Mountain on the 26th, or somewhere else in the United States, you can join thousands of brothers and sisters in Christ in the united goal of “unseating the spirit of racism.” For more information, go to OneRaceMovement.com.
"OneRace Movement ," website - http://oneracemovement.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 26 | BANGLADESH - Morjina’s* family tried to force her back into Islam, but she
refused. They have now deprived her of her inheritance rights. Pray for this sister’s situation.
*Names changed to protect identities

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

#2409 (8/22) "When Children “Choose” to Die - Sacrificing Babes on the Altar of Autonomy"

"WHEN CHLDREN  "CHOOSE” TO DIE - SACRIFICING BABES ON THE ALTER OF AUTONOMY"by John Stonestreet and Roberto Rivera , Breakpoint.org, August 21, 2018; http://www.breakpoint.org/2018/08/breakpoint-when-children-choose-to-die/ [AS I SEE IT: It is one thing when adults make tragic, ill-informed  decisions - such as to have an abortion, to have "gender reassignment" surgery, or to end their life. But for society to grant such "freedom" to children is forgetting that children are children and that even the most "mature" of them are still not fully-informed about the life consequences of their choices. When parents "choose" (there's that word again!) to abandon their responsibility to help their children make right choices, the consequences will often be tragic for all. When society abandons it's responsiblity to see that children are protected, the consequces are almost always tragic. - Stan]
        All must be sacrificed for the demon-gods “autonomy” and “choice.” This is why they are killing children in Belgium.

    In 2014, Belgium, which already had perhaps the most permissive euthanasia laws in the world, amended those laws to permit doctors to euthanize children. As is always the case, the rationale was a mixture of wooly thinking: a professed desire to alleviate suffering and a belief that children, some as young as nine, have the requisite emotional and intellectual capacity to choose to end their lives.

This is lethal nonsense, as Charles Lane of the Washington Post has repeatedly pointed out.
Lane’s most recent column on the subject was prompted by a July report issued by the Belgian agency that regulates euthanasia. according to the report, between the start of 2016 and the end of 2017, Belgian doctors euthanized three children, one of them only nine years old and another eleven years old. A member of the commission told Lane the law was strictly followed. He said, “I saw mental and physical suffering so overwhelming that I thought we did a good thing.”
     Actually, as Lane pointed out, the gentleman didn’t see anything. He was “relying on reports by the anonymous physicians who participated in the euthanasias.” The simple fact is there’s no way to independently verify the physicians’ assertions about the hopelessness of these children’s conditions, or how close they were to natural death. We simply have to take their word for it.

In Belgium, euthanasia is, to borrow an expression from science, a “black box.” We can see what it does—kill people, old and young—but we have no real idea about how it really works.
There are several things that make euthanizing children especially repugnant. As Lane writes, “Everywhere else in the world, the law reflects powerful human intuitions, moral and practical: that it is wrong to abandon hope for a person so early in life, no matter the illness . . .” This is why the death of a child is so devastating, spiritually as well as emotionally. It’s why the parents of children with disabilities, both cognitive and physical, are fierce advocates for their children and those like them.
    The 2016 book, “In a Different Key: The Story of Autism” is filled with stories about the parents of autistic children who refused to abandon hope for their children and instead persuaded the rest of society not to abandon hope, either.

But not only is Belgium turning its back on this noblest of human intuitions, it’s also turning its back on the responsibility to protect children from themselves. As Lanes writes, “it is absurd to grant ultimate medical autonomy to someone too young to vote or legally consent to sex.”
    Think about it: In Belgium if a fifteen-year-old girl expresses a desire to have sex with a 20-year-old boy, the answer is “no!” Her parents can’t write her a note exempting the “relationship” from the country’ laws against statutory rape. They can’t “consent” on her behalf. And yet, in Belgium a request from a nine-year-old to end his life is taken seriously. While his parents can intervene and veto the request, absent such a veto, the same black box that has ended the life of more than four thousand adults will consider his request.

An analogous dynamic is on display here in the U.S. Children who can’t legally consent to having sex under any circumstances, somehow are still taken seriously when it comes to the life-changing decision to begin taking puberty blockers. There’s even legal advice about how to get around recalcitrant parents, by invoking what’s called the “mature minor doctrine.”

All of this is an assault on the highest calling parents have: to protect and cherish our children. But this is what happens when people make autonomy their god: They end up sacrificing children on its altar.


[italics and colored emphasis mine]

RESOURCES - As John highlights, the cost we pay for our culture’s choice of autonomy is paid by the next generation in a chilling way. Pray for God’s mercy to be poured out and for Christian voices to be His advocates, calling societies back to protecting and cherishing our children.
"Belgian lawmakers vote on euthanasia for kids"Bernd Riegert | dw.com | February 13, 2014; https://www.dw.com/en/belgian-lawmakers-vote-on-euthanasia-for-kids/a-17245525
"Children are being euthanized in Belgium"Charles Lane | Washington Post | August 6, 2018; https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/children-are-being-euthanized-in-belgium/2018/08/06/9473bac2-9988-11e8-b60b-1c897f17e185_story.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 22 | NIGER A church in Tokarawa was attacked by radicals. When the leader
took the case to the village chief, he refused to act. Pray for God’s protection and encouragement.
*Names changed to protect identities

STANDING STRONG THROUGH THE STORM - OpenDoorsUSA.org
At my first defense, no one came to my support, but everyone deserted me. May it not be held against them.  2 Tim.y 4:16                                                 
SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THOSE WHO SUFFER
The Apostle Paul knew exactly what it was like to be alone, to be deserted by all who called themselves “brothers” and “sisters.” A former colleague who has done considerable travel among the persecuted says, “It is hard to believe that Christians are the largest persecuted group in the world today. But it is even more difficult to believe that this is so seldom mentioned in our gatherings and church services. More Christians know the names of their favorite actors than their fellow believers who are in prison.”
He continues, “With every trip something in my heart breaks as I hear the echoes of suffering:
I remember the echoes of an Egyptian mother as she shared how her young boy was stuck in a haystack because she refused to deny Jesus.
I remember the sounds of weeping as fellow students in Indonesia shared how Sariman, their co-student, was hacked to death.
I remember the cries of anguish as we walked from church to church that was burned to the ground on the island of Lombok.
I remember the tears of Rebecca in Iran as she showed the picture of her father who was stabbed to death for sharing the gospel.
I remember the voice of Pastor Daniel in Vietnam as he shared how he was chained to the ground for six months.
I remember the fear of Grace from Sudan as she shared how her church was attacked and her friend was shot through the head.
Oh, I remember the cries of Caleb in Eritrea as he shared with tears how two dear friends were executed in front of him because of their faith.
And I remember the tears of Joy in the southern Philippines as she shared how her fiancé was shot to death in their church in Mindanao.
But, most all, I remember the deafening sounds of silence every time I return home.
RESPONSE
How can I be silent today? How can I not speak on behalf of those who suffer? How can I desert those that belong to the same body that I belong to and who desperately need the encouragement of my intervention on their behalf?
PRAYER
Lord, broaden my awareness of the needs of my suffering brothers and sisters. May I not be known for my silence

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

#2408 (8/21) "The Catholic Abuse Scandal - Judgment in the House of God"

"THE CATHOLIC ABUSE SCANDAL - JUDGEMENT IN THE HOUSE OF GOD" by John Stonestreet andG. Shane Morris, Breakpoint.org, August 17, 2018; http://www.breakpoint.org/2018/08/breakpoint-the-catholic-abuse-scandal/
     There is a time to mourn. There’s also a time to demand answers and accountability. This is a time for both.

     The church is supposed to be the light of the world. But this [past] week, the doors of the church opened and what the world saw was darkness—on a staggering scale, on both sides of the Tiber. A long-awaited grand jury report on sex abuse among Pennsylvania Catholic clergy was released on Tuesday. In over 900 pages, the report revealed criminal conduct in six dioceses, going back seventy years. Three hundred “predator priests” were identified, as well as a thousand probable victims—a figure which, according to the report, is likely a fraction of the true total.

The stories from the major dioceses—especially in Pittsburgh—are sickening and horrific. “Children were raped in places of worship, in schools, and in diocesan owned vehicles, and were groomed through diocesan programs and retreats,” the report stated. One priest abused five sisters. Another impregnated a minor, and then helped pay for the abortion. Another assaulted at least a dozen boys and was later praised by his bishop for all he had “done for God’s people.” One raped a seven-year-old girl in the hospital as she was recovering from surgery. Another had victims pose without clothes like the crucified Christ.

As if that weren’t enough, Pennsylvania state Attorney General Josh Shapiro then described a pattern of denial and “systematic cover-up” by the clergy. “Priests were raping little boys and girls,” the grand jury wrote, “and the men of God who were responsible for them not only did nothing; they hid it all. For decades.
    Rod Dreher of the American Conservative was among those whose reporting years ago helped reveal the extent of the Boston priest abuse scandal. He thinks this is far from over. “There will be more grand juries,” he writes, “and more revelations.”

Now, I’m not Roman Catholic. Some of my dearest friends and colleagues are. To watch how this abuse and institutional cover-up is tearing them apart is awful. Shepherds trusted by millions have failed them in the worst way possible. Their futures include millstones around necks.

Simply put: The Catholic Church needs to clean house. Clergy at every level must cooperate with independent investigations into all allegations of abuse. No more bishops handling these charges. This needs to stop, now. Our nation’s 70 million Catholics have to demand it.

And all Christians should be praying for the victims—some of whom haven’t had justice for their entire lives.
    In fact, across our culture an historic reckoning is afoot. We see it at U.S. Gymnastics, we see it in college football. And lest Protestants be tempted to gloat, evangelical megachurches and entire denominations are being force to confront pastors and leaders who abuse their spiritual authority for sexual gratification.
    And in every single case, many who should have blown whistles remained silent. They chose to protect organizations instead of victims. Skeletons are being found in closets of churches everywhere. God help us.

But this must happen. Judgment must begin in the house of God. And Christians—especially pastors—are accountable before God in a way that football coaches and doctors aren’t. To abuse children—and then to cover up the abuse of children—while acting as a representative of Christ, is a sin that puts all of us in remembrance of the reality of Hell. This epidemic of sin has cost more than a thousand victims their innocence and trust in church, and for many – in Christ Himself. It’s a sin that will cost us all—Catholic and evangelical alike—credibility in this culture we can’t afford to lose.

The words of the prophet Jeremiah come to mind: “Jerusalem has sinned greatly and so has become unclean. All who honored her despise her, for they have all seen her naked; she herself groans and turns away.” Let us repent. And may God remember His promise not to turn away from us.

 [italics and  colored emphasis mine]

RESOURCES -  “For it is time for judgment to begin with God’s household; and if it begins with us, what will the outcome be for those who do not obey the gospel of God?” 1 Peter 4:17
"Report Reveals Widespread Sexual Abuse By Over 300 Priests In Pennsylvania"Katie Meyer, Kevin McCorry, Joe Hernandez, Lindsay Lazarski | NPR.org | August 14, 2018; https://www.npr.org/2018/08/14/636855561/report-reveals-widespread-sexual-abuse-by-over-300-priests-in-pa
"The PA Catholic Sex Abuse Horror"Rod Dreher | The American Conservative | August 14, 2018; https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-pa-catholic-sex-abuse-horror/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 21 | TAJIKISTAN - There are reports that secret service officers are posing as
church guests for “inside” information. Please pray for wisdom for leaders who must now navigate this threat.

Monday, August 20, 2018

#2407 (8/20) "4 Key Facts About ICE, and What Could Happen If It’s Abolished"

"4 KEY FACTS ABOUT ICE, AND WHAT COULD HAPPEN IF IT'S ABOLISHED"Fred Lucas / @FredLucasWH / August 18, 2018 / https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/08/18/4-key-facts-about-ice-and-what-could-happen-if-its-abolished/
A protester with the group Rise and Resist shows his sentiment Aug. 2 during four days of protests in New York's financial district. (Photo: Erik McGregor/Sipa USA/Newscom)

     U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials on Aug. 14 arrested and deported an illegal immigrant who is wanted in El Salvador on murder charges. Brian Alejandro Martinez reportedly had been arrested and freed several times in New Jersey and New York. ICE officials criticized authorities in Middlesex County, New Jersey, for releasing Martinez without notifying the federal agency.

While Immigration and Customs Enforcement in recent years has had to contend with “sanctuary” policies by cities and counties that protect illegal immigrants, the agency now faces a push by some in Congress to abolish it.

President Donald Trump is scheduled to honor ICE agents Monday at a White House event, even as many congressional Democrats call for restraining or ending the agency that enforces immigration law throughout the nation’s interior. The House adopted a resolution last month supporting ICE agents, but 167 Democrats refused to vote for it.
    Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, last month led a group of Democrats in sponsoring legislation to abolish ICE, saying:
    President Trump’s blanket directive to round up and target all undocumented immigrants underscores the unchecked power which ICE has used to terrorize our communities. From conducting raids at garden centers and meatpacking plants, to targeting families outside churches and schools, the president is using ICE as a mass-deportation force to rip apart the moral fabric of our nation. Sadly, President Trump has so misused ICE that the agency can no longer accomplish its goals effectively. As a result, the best path forward is this legislation, which would end ICE and transfer its critical functions to other executive agencies. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio are among Democrats who have said they support getting rid of ICE.

     Just 25 percent of voters say they are for abolishing the agency, according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll released last month. Trump has fired back in defense of ICE.
“Leading Democrat politicians have called to abolish ICE—nobody even believes it, they want to abolish ICE,” Trump said last month. “In other words, they want open borders and more crime, and that’s what you’re going to get. You’ll get more crime as you open up those borders.”

Primarily an immigration enforcement agency that doesn’t operate on the border, Immigration and Customs Enforcement still performs other functions. Here are four major facts about ICE, and what could happen if it ceases to exist.

1. Protecting Minority Communities
    If ICE were abolished, minority communities would be disproportionately harmed, said Matthew T. Albence, the agency’s executive associate director for enforcement and removal.
“These minority communities are the primary victims now, because these individuals are involved in gang activity and other criminal activity and generally they commit those crimes against those in the same communities in which they reside,” Albence told the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 31.
    His remarks came in an exchange during a hearing when Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, asked: “What if we just decided to abolish ICE? What would be the impact on our country in terms of public safety?” Albence responded:
    "You cannot have strong border security with a void in the interior. If an individual knows that they can come to the country and try and try and try and eventually get past the Border Patrol, and that there is no chance of any enforcement being taken against them, then you will never have border security. What in effect you are saying if you’re getting rid of the interior enforcement arm of immigration enforcement, you’re saying you want border security, you want Border Patrol to make all these arrests and stop people there, but once they get by the Border Patrol, let them go.

2. Enforcing Immigration Law
    Before 9/11, naturalization of legal immigrants and enforcement of immigration laws were under one agency—the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or INS. When Congress created the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, it established ICE as the enforcement arm while U.S. Customs and Immigration Services would be in charge of naturalizing legal immigrants.

The 9/11 Commission noted that terrorists involved in the 2001 attacks exploited U.S. immigration rules and some of the hijackers violated the terms of their visas.

A third arm of Homeland Security, called U.S. Customs and Border Protection and including the Border Patrol, is responsible for stopping illegal immigrants from entering the country. Trump will honor that agency’s work Monday as well as ICE’s. But once illegal immigrants slip past the border, only ICE can enforce laws on the interior, arresting and deporting illegal immigrants.

    The Trump administration significantly increased enforcement compared to the Obama administration. In fiscal year 2017, which began Oct. 1, 2016, nearly four months before Trump took office, ICE made 143,470 arrests and deported 226,119 individuals. In fiscal year 2016, the last full fiscal year of the Obama administration, the agency made 77,806 arrests. Although removals were higher that year—240,255—ICE asserts that was “largely attributed to the decline in border apprehensions.”
    The arrests during fiscal 2017 included 127,000 illegal immigrants who were charged or convicted of crimes inside the United States, according to the White House. More than 1,800 of those were homicides and another 48,000 were assaults. ICE made 4,818 gang-related arrests.
    “ICE also conducts investigations for violations under the federal criminal code for things like visa fraud, naturalization fraud, passport fraud, [and] alien unlawfully in possession of a firearm,” Dan Cadman, a former INS and ICE agent, told The Daily Signal.

“Do other agencies also handle some of this work? They do, but there are never enough law enforcement officers to handle all of the violations,” Cadman, now a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, a pro-enforcement think tank, told The Daily Signal. “Disbanding ICE would diminish the already finite pool of federal agents available.”

    Abolishing ICE doesn’t have a clear endgame, he said, since it seems pointless to transfer functions or create a new agency to do the same things. “Is it in fact just an end-around, to try and be sure that there is no agency available to do the things that Congress and the law as written require?” Cadman asked, adding that he suspects that is the case.
    
In a move unrelated to what some Democrats are pushing, 19 ICE special agents last month signed a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen asking that ICE be broken into two separate agencies.One would focus on enforcement and removal while the other would focus on investigations, intelligence gathering and fraud, human trafficking, and dismantling gangs.

3. Targeting Smugglers of People, Drugs, Guns
    Immigration and Customs Enforcement also combats the smuggling of people, drugs, money, counterfeit merchandise, and weapons into the United States. This includes confronting sexual trafficking, and in some cases, fighting child pornography.
    ICE made more than 11,000 arrests related to weapon offenses in fiscal year 2017, according to the White House.
    The agency is also responsible for “repatriation of cultural treasures,” or returning expensive items stolen from another country.
    ICE investigates large-scale human smuggling organizations that pose a national security risk, use violence, or take hostages. It targets the human smuggling chain immediately beyond the smugglers themselves. This includes overseas recruiters and organizations, fraudulent document providers, and transportation and employment networks that benefit from human smuggling operations.
    During fiscal 2017, ICE made more than 5,000 arrests related to sexual assaults and more than 2,000 related to kidnapping.
   It also apprehended more than 76,000 people for offenses involving dangerous drugs, according to the White House. Agents seized more than 980,000 pounds of narcotics, including 2,370 pounds of fentanyl and 6,967 pounds of heroin.

Increased enforcement on all these fronts is key, said Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which advocates enforcing current law. “Any enforcement agency is only as good as the politicians running it,” Mehlman told The Daily Signal. “If you’ve got an agency of law enforcement professionals, it’s still the political bosses that decide to implement or not implement the law.”

4. Preventing Terrorism
    ICE also specializes in identifying dangerous individuals before they enter the United States, or finding them after they illegally enter. The agency’s Counterterrorism and Criminal Exploitation Unit is comprised of two divisions: the Terrorist Tracking and Pursuit Group and the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System Exploitation Section. The terrorist tracking group coordinates with other Homeland Security agencies to identify those who overstayed or otherwise violated their visas.
    The student and visitor section investigates foreign nationals here for educational purposes who could be involved in criminal or terrorist activity or in intelligence gathering for a foreign power.

[italics and colored emphasis mine]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Securing the Border Is the Most Humane Policy"Rep. Michael C. Burgess / @michaelcburgess / August 17, 2018 / https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/08/17/securing-the-border-is-the-most-humane-policy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Praying Through the Open Doors World Watch List for persecuted believers:To learn more, please go to -https://www.opendoorsusa.org/take-action/pray/monthly-prayer-calendar/
Praying for Central Asia- In countries like Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan And Kyrgyzstan, a Bible is a treasured gift—and in some places, a hard thing to come by. These believers rely on the Word of God to help them face increasing persecution. Throughout August, we’ll be focusing on bringing Scripture to this part of the world, and we ask you to join us.
August 20 | BRUNEI - Brunei has taken another step toward implementing a law that
will make conversion from Islam to Christianity a crime punishable by deathPray with the church there.