Saturday, December 8, 2012

#380 (12/8) - End Hollywood Welfare Now!

NOTE: 1) first of all, much thanks to my former roommate and continued good friend Mike Rebholz for fixing the settings of my blog post (on the right). (Prov. 18:24b); 2) the following article continues the theme of Hollywood from the last post (#379) - which I encourage you to read, especially in regards to the prayer requests I included;  3) the article reminds me of a great book I read this past year, "Hollywood Hypocrites" by Jason Mattera, that I strongly recommend you read; and 4) please note the prayer request at the end of this article.

"Hollywood’s Corporate Welfare Should Be On the Chopping Block" - By: John Hayward ,

But the Michigan story contains a particularly delicious bit of jumbo-sized irony:
Hollywood may make movies about the evils of capitalism, but it rarely works without incentives, which are paid for by taxpayers. Nationwide, about $1.5 billion in tax breaks is awarded to the film industry each year, according to a state-by-state survey by The New York Times.
Within two months, 24 movies had signed up to film in Michigan — up from two the entire year before. The productions estimated that they would spend $195 million filming there, and in return they would be refunded about $70 million in cash.
Before long, residents were rushing out on their lunch breaks to catch a glimpse of celebrities like Drew Barrymore, who was filming her movie “Whip It” in Ann Arbor, and Clint Eastwood, who was shooting “Gran Torino” in the Detroit area. Even Michael Moore, who was filming a movie about corporate welfare called “Capitalism: A Love Story,” sought and received incentives.(Emphasis mine.)
   Over $800,000 in incentives, to be more specific. Michael Moore is basically a running satire of his own liberal audience, picking their pockets with absurdly dishonest propaganda films while he lives a millionaire lifestyle, and is notoriously hostile to organized labor in his own business practices.  If he didn’t already exist, a conservative blogger would have invented him.

Hollywood is what it slanders the rest of American business for being: a shell game where only the big millionaire fat cats make bank. Even theater owners get screwed – they’ve got to sell popcorn at ridiculous prices to stay in business.[And you probably thought they were just trying to rip you off!] Cash-strapped local governments forever fantasize about luring that huge Hollywood money with taxpayer incentives, but the jobs and other promised economic benefits rarely live up to the hype.  Meanwhile, productive local businesses that would create more healthy, lasting jobs get soaked to the bone with taxes, even as the Tinseltown millionaires roll away with bulging bank accounts, and look for another star-struck state government to loot.  And it’s rather difficult to re-purpose some of what Hollywood requires local taxpayers to subsidize. What do you do with an empty soundstage, once America’s entertainment royalty decides it doesn’t need them any more?

Republican budget negotiators are foolish if they don’t put Hollywood on the chopping block during these “fiscal cliff” negotiations.  Among other things, the excise tax on motion pictures from the 1950s – imposed to clean up World War 2 budget deficits – should be returned and expanded.  Let’s get all these tax-happy liberal celebrities and their pet politicians on the record explaining why this is the one “millionaire tax” we shouldn’t be considering.  It’s an especially bitter jest to make middle-class American taxpayers subsidize the transmission system for the ideology that has left them so much poorer. 

[bold and italics emphasis (for the most part) mine]

PRAYER REQUEST: Please PRAY that during the present and all future budget negotiations, these kind of subsidies for Hollywood would be ended and that local governments would cease to use taxpayer monies to lure Hollywood that doesn't return on such "investments."

Friday, December 7, 2012

#379 (12/22 - "The Emperor's New Clothes" -

NOTE: I have ideas for prayer related to the following article at the end of this post.

 - "Calling Filth by Name, " -  Breakpoint.org; by Eric Metaxas, Dec. 04
You remember the classic fairy tale, “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” Against overwhelming social pressure, a young boy alone has the courage and good sense to state what everyone else was denying—that the king was parading around in his underwear!

Well, we now have another young truth-teller pointing out the obvious. Not about an emperor’s wardrobe or lack thereof, but about a popular TV sitcom that has made millions for the entertainment industry even while, to borrow a well-worn phrase from Daniel Patrick Moynihan, it has defined deviancy down.

“If you watch ‘Two and a Half Men,’” this young TV critic says, “please stop watching ... Please stop filling your head with filth.” It’s the kind of verbal—if you’ll pardon the pun—dressing down of Hollywood decadence we don’t often hear these days. What makes it all the more striking is its source. The critic of “Two and a Half Men,” is also one of its stars—19-year old Angus T. Jones, the proverbial “half a man” in the show’s title.

Unlike a lot of people on TV and in the movies, Jones doesn’t gloss over the fact that what we watch can be harmful to our souls. “If I am doing any harm,” he said, “I don’t want to be here. I don’t want to be contributing to the enemy’s plan.”  Wow! Even more amazing, this young man is starting to see the personal implications for his role on the program. “You cannot be a true God-fearing person and be on a television show like that,” Jones said. “I’m not okay with what I’m learning, what the Bible says, and being on that television show.”

Now Jones, who, according to WORLD magazine is a convert to Seventh Day Adventism, has since apologized for his remarks—apologized, that is, if his remarks showed any disrespect to the people he has worked with on the show over the years. But his point about “filling your head with filth” remains.

Jones, of course, is not the first star to question the appropriateness of Hollywood fare. Just earlier this year, actress Julia Roberts told People magazine she doesn’t allow her children to watch her movies. “We’re more book people in our house,” she told the magazine, adding that her family enjoys “stories and poetry and talking, sharing ideas.”

What Jones and Roberts are saying is something we Christians should know already: What we put into our heads affects us, for good or for ill. The steady drip-drip-drip of sexual humor showcased on “Two and a Half Men” and other shows conditions us to accept ideas that are antithetical to what God says about sexuality and the good life. It conforms us to the world. There’s a reason Scripture exhorts us: “whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things” (Philippians 4:8).

But there’s another lesson here: As Christians, we have to reach the culture—which is the air most people breathe. Shockingly, except for a few shining examples, we’ve all but ceded the culture to the secular left. Our story—about Christ, grace, redemption, and hope—is almost never represented in the public square outside of the narrow realms of politics or theology. If we want to turn back the tide of unbelief, we cannot neglect the culture. We need to be creating sitcoms and movies and plant Christ’s flag in that world. After all, He owns it all.
It’s good to tell the truth about the darkness that is so prevalent in Hollywood. But it’s even better to light a candle.

[bold and italics emphasis mine]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
PRAYER REQUEST for those in media: 1) PRAY for Christians (such as Angus, of whom there are probably more than we realize) and "pre"-believers (those who understand what Hollywood is doing to our culture and may soon come to trust in Christ) to have wisdom to not just speak out against the many excesses of the entertainment industry ; 2) PRAY for Christians in media would themselves create Phil. 4:8 type of movies and music; 3) CONSIDER praying regularly for those in media who influence our culture. You can either go to the website of MasterMedia ministries for two such persons or groups to pray for EACH DAY or you can have the prayer guide mailed to you in quarterly installments (as I do); just go to: http://www.mastermediaintl.org/calendar/ and 4) CONSIDER another prayer idea: each time you watch a movie, music performance, or an interview with someone in the entertainment industry, afterwards just stop and pray for their salvation and for their making a positive Phil 4:8 impact on our culture.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

#378 (12/6) - "The Danger of International Internet Regulation"

NOTE: Because of still unexplained problems, you will need to scroll down on the right side to near the end of this blog to find information such as 1) how to post comments, 2) how to contact your representatives in Washington, 3) websites I recommend, and 4) books I strongly urge you to read.

PRAYER REQUEST: (Please read the article below.) Let us  PRAY that all attempts to control the flow of information on the internet, even when said to be "in the name of national security," will be very carefully scrutinized and be vigorously opposed whenever our freedoms are clearly endangered.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- By Amy Payne On November 29, 2012

Regulating the Internet is something Americans have resisted here at home. Now that fight is going global.

The United Nations—of course—has an agency that oversees international telecommunications. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) was founded in 1865, when the telegraph was its main concern. Now it’s trying to expand its influence over modern-day communications. Starting on Monday [12/1] , the 193 member states of the ITU will meet in Dubai to update the 1988 International Telecommunications Regulations.

The ITU is looking to transform itself into a “global Internet rule maker,” according to a new Issue Brief [1] by Heritage’s James Gattuso and Brett Schaefer. “At a time when competition should be making it less relevant, it is expanding its turf.” They set the scene:
"Some countries have proposed granting the ITU more authority over the Internet and making other changes purportedly for such goals as enhancing cybersecurity, reducing costs for developing-country consumers, and increasing investment by telecommunications providers. However, many of these seemingly benign proposals could undermine the Internet freedoms that are essential to spurring economic development and protecting human rights. The U.S. should oppose these efforts."
As with other United Nations bodies, the U.S. gets one vote that is considered equally with countries like Libya. Of course, in the case of the Internet, many countries’ governments consider it a threat—online communications have helped people organize protests and uprisings like the “Arab Spring.”

“Governments that will be in attendance at the closed-door…summit—including some that currently censor Internet traffic within their own borders—have proposed amendments to the treaty that could make it easier to monitor and control how everyone uses the Web,” warns Eric Johnson of AllThingsD.com [2]. Former Assistant Secretary of Commerce Larry Irving said that “fear is a great driver, and people like to regulate what they fear. [2]”

The ITU’s process is anything but transparent, so most of the key details known so far have been leaked, appropriately, on the Internet. According to the leaked documents, several troubling proposals are on the table from different countries, many of which resent the current Internet framework because of a perceived dominance by the United States.
For example [1]: Russia would require networks to identify subscribers when delivering traffic. The sponsoring states argue that these powers would help them fight cybercrime, but they could also be used for censorship and political suppression.

Schaefer and Gattuso warn that regulating the Internet is, in short, a very bad idea. “At best, this is unnecessary, as the Internet is doing quite well under the current framework. At worst, the expansion will allow the U.N.—parent organization of the ITU—to stifle the Web.”

The House of Representatives has already spoken out against this international regulation. In August, it unanimously passed (414–0) a resolution urging the Obama Administration to “clearly articulate…the consistent and unequivocal policy of the United States to promote a global Internet free from government control.” Senator Marco Rubio (R–FL) introduced a similar version of this resolution in the Senate that passed by unanimous consent on September 22.

America cannot stand for any rules that justify or facilitate censorship or repression, or an expansion of the authority of the ITU over the Internet. The freedom of people around the world may depend on it.

[bold  and italics emphasis mine]

Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org; URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/11/29/morning-bell-the-danger-of-international-internet-regulation/

URLs in this post:
[1] new Issue Brief: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/11/resist-the-increasing-role-of-the-united-nations-in-internet-governance
[2] AllThingsD.com: http://allthingsd.com/20121128/google-government-reps-warn-against-internet-regulation-summit/
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

#377 (12/5) - Why Republicans Caving In to the President Will Not Bring Lasting Solutions

PRAYER REQUEST: If you've followed the news at all for weeks now, you know all about the back and forth going on now between the Presidet and the Republicans - whose majority in the House allows them to control the federal budget . While the article below talks about the latest developments, keep in mind that things can still change. Let's PRAY that what is finally agreed upon will not just "kick the can down the road" as far as dealing with the systemic problems in how our government is spending tax dollars. PRAY that the conservatives will stand strong in resisting any false promises made about cutting spending and will not give in to pressure to just go along with the President. PRAY that Republicans will take courage that though they re-elected the President, Americans did so by one of the slimest margins and  that it does not necessarily mean an endorsement of his policies. PRAY that in the end the American economy will not be further weakened nor the American people further hurt by whatever agreement is finally reached.

"House Republicans Cave on Tax Increases and Punt Entitlements"
 -By Amy Payne,  December 4, 2012

When President Obama put forth his first offer on the fiscal cliff, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said, “You can’t be serious.” We could say the same thing to the Speaker after his counteroffer yesterday.

In a letter [1] signed by House Republican leadership, including Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) and Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI), Boehner offered to raise taxes by $800 billion and cut spending by $1.4 trillion, with no substantive reforms to the entitlement programs that are driving U.S. spending and debt [2].

Heritage’s Alison Fraser, director of the Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies, and J.D. Foster, the Norman B. Ture Senior Fellow in the Economics of Fiscal Policy, quickly responded [3] that “the Republican counteroffer, to the extent it can be interpreted from the hazy details now available, is a dud. It is utterly unacceptable. It is bad policy, bad economics.”

Boehner’s letter [1] to the President actually said that the Republicans were not going to make their more serious proposal, which has already passed the House.
"If we were to take your Administration’s proposal at face value, then we would counter with the House-passed Budget Resolution. It assumes an overhaul of our tax code with revenue remaining at historically normal levels and proposes structural reforms to preserve and protect the Nation’s entitlement programs, ensuring they are sustainable for the long-term rather than continuing to grow out of control."
But, they said, “we recognize it would be counterproductive to publicly or privately propose entitlement reforms that you and the leaders of your party appear unwilling to support in the near-term.”

This is precisely the time for laying out bold reforms, showing the nation the principles, vision and policies conservatives share to dig out of this budget mess, today and for the long term. Instead, the leadership pointed to a plan they said was suggested by Erskine Bowles, the co-chair of President Obama’s debt commission and formerly Bill Clinton’s White House Chief of Staff. It raises taxes, but not by raising tax rates—instead, by lowering the amount or number of tax deductions or exemptions available.

This misses the point of the tax reform America really needs, said Fraser and Foster:
"While preferable in general to raising tax rates, this proposal largely dooms future efforts at tax reform based on the sound principle of broadening the tax base to lower the rates. Instead, this proposal would broaden the base, not to lower rates, but to raise revenues. So much for improved economic growth."
Essentially, it appears the Republican leadership caved on raising taxes and first steps toward fundamental entitlement reforms [4] that are desperately needed to keep Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid going. To be sure, the Boehner letter is short on details. But, as Fraser and Foster put it, “Beyond disappointing, the House Republican counteroffer appears at best to suggest incremental tweaks to these programs. Without real entitlement reform—not just spending cuts—we will never fix the underlying problem.”

Not only would this be the right course to take, but Americans polled just after the election have these priorities more in order than the President and Congress. Just a few days after the election, Gallup asked people to rank a list of 12 issues by importance for the President’s second term. Restoring “a strong economy and job market” was No. 1, with entitlement reform [5]—“take major steps to ensure the long-term stability of Social Security and Medicare”—No. 2. “Make major cuts in federal spending” was No. 6 on the list, while raising taxes on people making more than $250,000 a year was way down the list at priority No. 10.

Now is the time for leaders to get serious. That means serious entitlement reforms that will deliver real savings and improve the programs. The President and House Republicans should both start over and work together toward solutions the nation truly needs.

[bold  and italics emphasis mine]

[More from The Foundry: “Fiscal Cliff: House Republican Proposal Abandons Core Principles, Gains Little. [3]”]

Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org; URL
to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/12/04/morning-bell-house-republicans-cave-on-tax-increases-and-punt-entitlements/  URLs in this post:
[1] letter: http://heritageaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/20121203_boehner_letter.pdf
[2] driving U.S. spending and debt: http://www.heritage.org/federalbudget/entitlements-historical-tax-levels
[3] responded: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/12/03/fiscal-cliff-house-republican-proposal-abandons-core-principles-gains-little/
[4] fundamental entitlement reforms: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/11/six-bipartisan-entitlement-reforms-to-solve-the-real-fiscal-crisis-only-presidential-leadership-is-needed
[5] entitlement reform: http://www.gallup.com/poll/158834/economy-entitlements-iran-americans-top-priorities.aspx

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

#376 (12/4) - A Real Threat To Christians on College Campuses

PRAYER REQUEST: The following is about something you've possibly not heard about, especially if you tend to only get your news from the mainstream press (or the decidedly left-leanng Comedy Central cable shows as so many young adults unfortunately do these days). As the religious freedom of Chrstians in particular comes under increasing attack (in many places besides the college campus as described below), we need to be in PRAYER for Christians to have wisdom to know how to respond most wisely in defending themselves and in dealing with reduced freedoms if need be.)

"Christians on Campus - Our Right to Exist"- by John Stonestreet, Breakpoint.org; November 30, 2012

Our nation’s universities have long prided themselves on serving as forums for open and free exchange of ideas. But a growing trend in schools throughout our nation is threatening to put an end to that legacy, at least for evangelical Christians. Let me explain.

Earlier this year, Chuck Colson and my co-host, Eric Metaxas, told you about events at Vanderbilt University, where they recently adopted “anti-discrimination” regulations. These would require student groups to allow anyone—regardless of beliefs or behavior—to obtain group membership and seek leadership positions. As Eric pointed out in April, this amounts to an attack on these groups’ right to exist.

To borrow his example, such regulations would theoretically force a university chapter of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), to allow steak connoisseurs and fur enthusiasts into their ranks and leadership. This may not sound like such a big deal, until you realize that even a small cohort of these “fur-draped carnivores” could tip the membership scales and vote the group into extinction.
Well, PETA likely doesn’t have much to fear from these regulations—but Christian groups do. Increasingly, they’re being singled out with policies which David French, senior counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, calls “absurd.”

“[This] level of mandated openness…actually diminishes diversity,” he says. “It’s utterly antithetical to free expression.” And it’s not just happening at Vanderbilt. Schools nationwide like Brown, Colby, Amherst, Williams, Bowdoin, and the Universities of Maine and North Carolina have all pursued similar policies. Now the latest, Tufts University in Massachusetts, is getting national press coverage as a kind of epicenter for the controversy.

Tufts’ chapter of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship is 120 members strong, and has been a model of Christian openness and tolerance for years, welcoming members with a variety of beliefs, including some from the LGBT community. But a recent ruling by the Tufts student judiciary revoked InterVarsity Fellowship’s status as a university group on the grounds that its constitution requires leaders to celebrate “the basic truths of Christianity,” as well as to practice sexual chastity.

The university’s decision implements the logic of one of the worst Supreme Court rulings in years. In the 2010 case Christian Legal Society v. Martinez the court essentially held that religious groups must place no stipulation on the beliefs of members. In other words, they’re not allowed to define themselves according to their defining beliefs.

Greg Jao, national field director of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, called this reasoning in the case of Tufts “illogical, and a little bizarre.” “Groups can only exist,” he says, “if their leaders can affirm the reason for that group’s existence.”

As we’ve pointed out before on BreakPoint, atheist groups on campus would not appreciate the university forcing them to allow Christians into leadership positions. Gay and Lesbian clubs would not take kindly to opponents of same-sex “marriage” filling their seats and running for president. By the same token, Christians must have a right to exercise our beliefs in public and tangible ways. And yes—that means being able to police both membership and leadership according to the group’s beliefs. Otherwise, as Jao noted, there’s little point in having the group at all.

Folks, this is political correctness run amok. And as French noted, it actually ends up destroying, not preserving, diversity. But that may be exactly what some school and student officials at Tufts and elsewhere have in mind.

This is why we must defend the real meaning of religious freedom on all fronts against redefinition. True freedom does not end when we leave church, and that’s not what America’s founders had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment. We must be free to gather together and express our faith in the statehouse, the marketplace, and especially the halls of academia.

[bold and italics emphasis mine]

Sunday, December 2, 2012

#375 (12/2) - "Advent Preparation - Embracing the Story Behind Christmas"

NOTE: As always on Sundays, I encourage you in Central Florida to watch the program "Truth That Transforms" featuring the preaching of the late Dr. D.James Kennedy and a special video presentation afterwards. You can watch in at 5 pm on channel 55.1 or on Monday at 7 pm. on channel 52.2. (You can also watch the sermon at www.truthinaction.org)

- by John Stonestreet, Breakpoint.org; November 26, 2012

The holiday season can seem every bit as chaotic, random and thrown together as the playlists of those obnoxious 24/7 Christmas music stations. Going from Black Friday to church pageants to being frisked by the TSA as we travel to sometimes awkward family gatherings strangely resembles going from the materialism of “Santa Baby,” to the light spirituality of “The Little Drummer Boy,” to “You’re a Mean One, Mr. Grinch,” concluding with “Grandma Got Run Over by a reindeer.” And we end up feeling like Charlie Brown screaming at Linus, “Can’t anyone tell me what Christmas is all about?”
So what do we do? Well, one important thing is to remember what Eric Metaxas reminded us of a week ago: that it’s not really Christmas season—it’s Advent season, a time set aside by the church to help believers prepare to receive the fullness of Jesus’ coming.

And it’s not just in remembrance of His incarnation, coming to Bethlehem as a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, but also in anticipation of His return as the “Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory,” who will “send his angels to gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens” (Mark 13:26-27).

Over the past few years, walking through this season of Advent in prayer, scripture and devotional readings has been a huge blessing to my family, my church, and to me personally.
Another thing that has really helped me is studying just how big this Christmas story is. Behind all the gifts, the carols, nativity scenes, and dinner parties is a narrative that spans from the creation of the heavens and earth to the re-creation of the heavens and earth.

Here’s what I mean: All those characters we remember in the Christmas story—Mary, the Wise Men, Shepherds, Angels, Joseph, Zachariah, Elizabeth, Simeon—they all have something in common. They identified what was happening to them as being firmly rooted in the promises of God—promises to His people detailed in the Old Testament. Thinking like they did—that behind all of the noise and chaos of this time of year is a story being unfolded—has changed almost everything about how I approach Advent and Christmas.

One resource I go back to over and over again to remind myself of this is Michael Card’s incredible CD “The Promise.” Rather than just picking eight to ten Christmas carols he liked and re-singing them, Michael’s CD beautifully takes us in song on the journey from the Old Testament prophecies about Jesus through the specifics of the details in the nativity, to the establishment of Jesus on the throne of David as the ruler of all things....

And I’ve partnered with T. M. Moore to prepare a special Advent study for you and your family called “He Has Come.” The study consists of a teaching DVD, devotional studies on Advent, and a CD of many sacred carols which reflect the worldview truths established by the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. We have both the Michael Card CD and our “He Has Come” Advent study for you at the BreakPoint book store online. If you’d like both for yourself or your family or friends, we’re offering them together in a special Christmas bundle at BreakPoint.org.

And this Advent, let’s look beyond all the glitzy schmaltziness of our culture’s celebration of the holidays, and see the grand story behind Christmas, and prepare ourselves to celebrate the bedrock truth of our faith and the reason for our hope: Christ has come, and He shall come again.

[bold and italics emphasis mine]

Saturday, December 1, 2012

#374 (12/1) - "Reasons for Conservatives to Be Thankful [Despite the Recent Elections]]"

A BLOG NOTE: If you've looked to the right of this blog page, you've noticed large gaps of empty space after the first several entries. I don't know why, but  since recently, I cannot remove those gaps NOR type any new text but one letter at a time. Please PRAY that this malfunction might be reseolved soon. In the meantime, please scroll down to almost the very end of that column to find instructions on a) how to post your comments, b) how to contact your Congressional representatives, and c) websites AND then books I highly recommend. (Especially if you have any suggestions, please email me at: yonashiro@bellsouthl.net)

PRAYER REQUEST:"Will the Supreme Court Redefine Marriage?" -- By Mark Martin, CBN News Reporter, Saturday, December 01; http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2012/November/Will-the-Supreme-Court-Redefine-Marriage/

 .... The next opportunity for an announcement on how the Court will deal with gay marriage cases is Monday, though the justices could also put off a decision until their next private meeting in a week. A big question is, when they do address the issue of homosexual marriage, what will it mean for the traditional definition of marriage?

The Supreme Court faces the argument that the institution of marriage should be redefined -- that the Constitution gives people the civil right to marry regardless of sexual orientation. Voters in 31 states have amended their constitutions to prohibit homosexual marriage, with North Carolina being the most recent in May. Voters also banned same-sex marriage in California by supporting Proposition 8, but federal courts struck it down. That ruling is on hold while the issue is being appealed.If the Court rules in favor of gay marriage, that could lead to the overturning of every state constitutional provision and law banning same-sex marriage.

Pro-family activists say it's really a fight for the youth of the country. "It's all about education of children," Republican Maryland Delegate Don Dwyer told CBN's The Brody File. "That's what it really boils down to. It's about the re-definition of the word marriage so that it can be taught in the public schools as a normal sexual lifestyle." "It's taught in the schools to young children," said Frank Schubert, a campaign strategist for traditional marriage. "People who believe that marriage is as God designed it are punished; they're sued; they're brought before human rights commissions. There's all kinds of consequences that befall us."
Same-sex marriage is legal, or will be soon, in nine states and the District of Columbia.

Homosexual marriage supporters are also challenging the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1996. DOMA defines marriage for all purposes, including federal benefits, as between a man and a woman. Four federal district courts and two appeals courts have overturned the provision. The Obama administration announced last year that it no longer would defend DOMA. In May, the president officially endorsed gay marriage. Republicans in the House of Representatives have stepped in to defend the law in court.

Any homosexual marriage cases probably would be argued before the Supreme Court in March, with a decision expected by the end of June.

[bold and italics emphasis mine]

1. PRAY that when the court finally does hear a case about homosexual marriage, it will rule against it and will uphold traditional marriage.

2. PRAY for the protection of America's youth from "politically correct" teaching about homosexuality and that they will be discerning of the truth regarding it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-  By Rich Tucker On November 23, 2012

There are plenty of things to be thankful for this week, and this year as well. Yes, after our country’s recent elections, big government remains the rule here in the United States and throughout the West. Yet the language used by the candidates (both talked of reducing federal spending and creating jobs, for example) and the closeness of the race proved that, in the U.S. at least, conservatism remains a powerful force.

Conservative thinkers present a compelling, principled alternative to liberal ideas. Right-leaning politicians retained control of the House of Representatives, where they’ll control all spending bills and be able to push back against the expansion of government. Conservative governors will run 30 states and can use their offices to thwart federal overreach. Many governors, for example, have already announced they won’t set up Obamacare insurance exchanges, which will save the states money and may doom the entire federal power grab.

Rather than despair, conservatives should use this holiday season to count our blessings, review our plans [1], and further our agenda in 2013. But the act of giving thanks requires someone or something to give thanks to. So it’s also worth noting that Thanksgiving highlights the importance of religion in public life, and that our unique founding ensures that religion remains a key pillar of American greatness. President Abraham Lincoln created the modern Thanksgiving Day tradition when he announced, in 1863, that it would be celebrated as an official national holiday [2]. Lincoln unapologetically cited [3] “the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy.” Long before that, President George Washington named November 26, 1789, as a day of thanksgiving devoted to [4] “the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be.”
Famously, God went unmentioned [5] last year. Yet President Obama has made it a point in years past to direct thanks to God. “As we stand at the close of one year and look to the promise of the next, we lift up our hearts in gratitude to God for our many blessings, for one another, and for our Nation,” read [6] his Thanksgiving Presidential Proclamation in 2010.

In defense of Obama, some will surely cite a “wall of separation between church and state” that doesn’t actually exist in the Constitution. As Daniel Dreisbach [7] explains in a First Principles [8] essay, this figure of speech actually dates to a letter written by President Thomas Jefferson in 1802. In reality, the First Amendment didn’t aim to protect people from ever being exposed to any religion. It only aimed to ensure that the federal government wouldn’t establish a state-run church, such as the Church of England.
Dreisbach cites Jefferson’s second inaugural address, when the third President declared:
"In matters of religion, I have considered that its free exercise is placed by the constitution independent of the powers of the general [i.e., federal] government. I have therefore undertaken, on no occasion, to prescribe the religious exercises suited to it; but have left them, as the constitution found them, under the direction and discipline of State or Church authorities acknowledged by the several religious societies."
Although the First Amendment prevents Congress from establishing a religion or prohibiting its free exercise, Presidents, as well as Congress, have always recognized the American regard for sacred practices and beliefs. Jefferson himself actively supported religious institutions. While in office, he personally approved [9] federally funded programs that built churches and supported Christian missionaries.

This Thanksgiving, instead of replaying our disappointments, let’s focus on the great things about our exceptional nation. The American people are still self-governing citizens. Our Constitution is still the most successful constitution known to man. American churches continue to give people a spiritual home and, along the way, save lives through good works. That’s worth pausing to give thanks for—this week and every week.

[bold and italics emphasis mine]
Quick Hits:

Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/11/23/morning-bell-reasons-for-conservatives-to-be-thankful/
URLs in this post:
[1] review our plans: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349319:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[2] celebrated as an official national holiday: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349320:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[3] Lincoln unapologetically cited: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349321:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[4] devoted to: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349322:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[5] went unmentioned: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349323:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[6] read: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349324:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[7] Daniel Dreisbach: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349325:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[8] First Principles: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349326:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[9] personally approved: http://links.heritage.org/ct/10349327:13843889341:m:1:172584532:7C0FCFF1B1CDDEC860EEEB31D98EE415:r
[10] series of advisories and admonitions from the federal government: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/govt-tells-americans-what-discuss-holiday-dinner-declares-thanksgiving-family-health
[11] called the police on Salvation Army volunteers: http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2012/11/21/woman-calls-cops-on-salvation-army-workers-for-ringing-bells/
[12] biggest audience in four years: http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/11/22/charlie-brown-thanksgiving/
[13] to study the culinary skill of turning thin strips of beef into jerky: http://www.washingtonguardian.com/jerky-ing-taxpayer-around
[14] undercut the Defense Department’s “green energy” agenda: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/20/us-energy-boom-undermines-logic-pentagons-alternative-fuel-subsidies/

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved