Tuesday, October 15, 2013

#671 (10/15) TODAY Is Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity; "Thoughts on the Shut Down..."

REMINDER: Check out this week's broadcast of ''Truth That Transofrms” program entitled “The New Tolerance?” http://www.truthinaction.org/index.php/kennedy-classics/?src=tiam_banner 

TODAY IS "Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity."Pro-Life Students Will Take Vow of Silence to Speak Up for the Unborn," - by Lauren Enriquez | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 10/9/13; http://www.lifenews.com/2013/10/09/pro-life-students-will-take-vow-of-silence-to-speak-up-for-the-unborn/
pro-life-silent-protest-line
"[Today,] Tuesday, October 15, students across America will participate in a day of solidarity to show their respect for life. The “Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity” is an outlet for students to express their pro-life views without using words or engaging in arguments. Pro-life students who will forego speaking on October 15 will also honor with their silence the members of their generation (including anyone born after the legalization of abortion on-demand in America in 1973 with the Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade) who were never allowed to be born...." [italics and underline my emphasis]


URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS:

URGENT PRAYER REQUEST"Syrian Christians Brace for Strike, Ask for Prayer," - by Gary Lane, August 31, http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2013/August/Syrian-Christians-Brace-for-Strike-Ask-for-Prayer/"As Syrians brace themselves for a possible U.S. military attack, many of the county's Christians are praying for divine intervention. They say military action against the Assad regime will only bring them greater hardship and suffering and they're asking Christians worldwide to pray that God intervenes to bring peace to their nation. They believe the collective prayers of Christians around the world could reverse an escalating conflict..."

[EGYPT Continue to pray for the tense situation in Egypt and especially for the Christian believers who are being targeted with violence by Muslim Brotherhood members.]      

URGENT PRAYER REQUEST- Update on Kenneth Bae: "US Ready to Bargain with N. Korea for Bae's Release,"-  CBNNews.com,  Aug 14, 2013  http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2013/August/S-Ready-to-Bargain-with-N-Korea-for-Baes-Release/  - The United States is willing to engage North Korea to secure the release of imprisoned American Christian Kenneth Bae. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said the United States is "willing to consider a number of different options" to bring him home.In a video recently released by a North Korean newspaper, Bae requested the United States send a high-ranking official to North Korea to seek his pardon. It is unclear if he spoke of his own volition in the video. Bae, 45, was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor for sharing his faith. He suffers health problems such as diabetes and is currently hospitalized.[PRAY for 1) God's healing of and presence with Pastor Bae, 2) His earliest release by the North Korean government, and 3) God's comfort for his family and friends.] 

Vigils Mark One Year Imprisonment of Pastor Saeed - CBNNews.com, Thursday, September 26, 2013 - Today marks one-year that American pastor Saeed Abedini has been held in an Iranian prison. He is serving an eight-year sentence because of his Christian faith. It has been a year of torment as he has suffered beatings, physical pain from untreated medical conditions, and separation from his wife and two children... The suffering has not dampened his passion for Jesus. Pastor Abedini has led more than 30 prisoners to Christ during his time in prison. This afternoon, thousands of Americans from coast to coast will pray for his release. Events will be held in 40 states at capitols, city halls, parks and churches. Thousands more will join from 15 nations around the world

PRAY: - For comfort and peace for Saeed’s wife and children here in the U.S.
- For a strong witness and testimony from Pastor Abedini in the prison where God has placed him
- For Christians around the world who are being persecuted for their faith in Christ
- BOLDly (Beside Our Leaders Daily) for leadership from the White House and State Department in defending the freedoms of Abedini and other Americans
- GO TO SaveSaeed.org to sign a petition over 600,000 others asking for his immediate release.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Thoughts on the Shut Down - What Would Chuck Say?," - By: Eric Metaxas|Breakpoint.org: October 14, 2013; http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/breakpoint-commentaries-archive/entry/13/23570?spMailingID=7161182&spUserID=MTMyMjM2ODE5OQS2&spJobID=93000767&spReportId=OTMwMDA3NjcS1

Back in 1992, Chuck Colson recorded a BreakPoint commentary about government gridlock. Now, gridlock in general is of course a lot different than a shutdown. But I think a lot of what Chuck had to say still applies today. See if you agree. Here’s Chuck, from way back in 1992.

Now that President Bush has suffered his first veto override, here's betting we will hear even more complaints about government gridlock.President Bush blames it on a Democratic Congress that won't pass his initiatives. Governor Clinton promises he'll solve gridlock if elected. And Ross Perot says when he gets under the hood, the engine of government will hum along without a creak.

Now, it's true that our government is slow and unwieldy at times. But is government gridlock necessarily a bad thing? If you think about it, the only thing that happens when government is gridlocked is that it doesn't pass as many laws. The White House and Congress each set up barriers to keep the other side from getting their legislation through. Well, if you say this is bad, you're really saying we need to unclog government so it can churn out more laws, more quickly.

But does America really need more laws? Every law Congress passes puts one more restriction on what private individuals and groups can do. Every decision Congress makes means one less decision people are free to make on their own. Every bill allocating money to some worthy project means there's less money in your pocket and mine to allot to our own worthy causes.

In short, pretty much every law Congress passes takes power out of private hands and puts it into the government’s hands. The only people who could be in favor of this are those who don't trust private agencies, like families, churches, and businesses--people who think government is the solution to all our problems.

Well, our Founding Fathers didn't think that. They realized that an ever-expanding state could become a threat to liberty. And so they decided to build barriers into the system right from the beginning—to prevent Congress from passing laws in a casual manner. They designed the system so that Congress is held in check by the President, with his veto power. And in turn the President is held in check by Congress. Checks and balances prevent any one person or group from holding absolute power.
You see, the Founders weren't concerned about government gridlock; they were concerned about excessive government growth and power.

The system they set up may be inefficient—bills may be held back while people argue and debate them. Congress and the President may have to work out compromises. But the alternative is to get rid of the checks and balances, and then just let a single group in government make all the decisions.Whenever power is concentrated, it may be more efficient, but it inevitably spells trouble, and even can easily lead to tyranny.

[NOTE: You should recall that this is exactly what happened in 2008 when the people turned not just the Presidency but BOTH Houses of Congress and we ended up having legislation like Obamacare (which the majority of Americans now do NOT want) being rammed through Congress.(" so that we can find out what's in it" - as the Democratic Speaker of the House infamously said at the time). It should be noted that the people had voted for one-party government in '08 but since 2010 have voted every other year to HAVE the divided government we have and thus ensured that we would have a built in system of checks on each branch. Obviously, the hope was that both sides could work through their differences for the best solution but it's not proving as easily done as hoped. - Stan]

So the next time you hear people complaining about government gridlock, don't be taken in. Ask them which they prefer: a system of checks and balances where power is spread out among all the branches of government—or a system that concentrates power in a small group? Do they prefer a system that gives freedom to private agencies, or one where the government makes all the decisions for them? Then you might be able to tell them that the frustration of gridlock is just one of the prices we pay in order to enjoy a free society and limited government.

[bold and italics emphasis mine]

FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION
RESOURCES:
"Powers, Separated on Purpose," - Charles C. W. Cooke | Nationalreview.com | October 1, 2013; http://nationalreview.com/article/359992/powers-separated-purpose-charles-c-w-cooke
"Balancing Act," -Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org; http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/breakpoint-commentaries-search/entry/13/10080
"Balancing Act - When Government Gridlock Is Good" - By: Chuck Colson; Breakpoint.org;
http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/breakpoint-commentaries-search/entry/13/10080?spMailingID=7161182&spUserID=MTMyMjM2ODE5OQS2&spJobID=93000767&spReportId=OTMwMDA3NjcS1
"Dangerous Disconnect," - Chuck Colson | BreakPoint.org | May 24, 2010;
http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/breakpoint-commentaries-search/entry/13/14519

No comments:

Post a Comment