Tuesday, September 11, 2012

#318(9/11) - "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of a New School Year"

PRAYER REQUEST: "Heavenly Father, on this annniversary of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, we pray for the families of the victims, the American heroes, and the thousands of American and foreign servicemen who were killed or wounded in defending our freedoms in Iraq and Afghanistan these intervening years. May we ourselves recommit to defending freedom and standing up against threats to our national security through our voices, and our actions as voters each election. In the name of the Lord Jesus, Amen." - Stan]

[FYI - (1)My GENday is Sept. 19th. When is YOURS?;(2)Before Election Day, get ahold of a copy from the library of "Obama's America." You only THINK you know him.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- By Amy Payne, September 4, 2012

As of today, the vast majority of American students have begun a new school year. As lunches are packed and carpool lines grow, Heritage reviews the good, bad, and ugly in education.

The Good >
Support for school choice is at an all-time high. In a poll released in August, school choice favorability jumped [1] 10 percentage points since last year, a sign that the proliferation of options such as vouchers, education savings accounts, and online learning is creating a welcome choice for families across the country.

Options like the education savings accounts implemented in Arizona [2], statewide vouchers in effect in Louisiana [3], and tuition tax credits benefitting children in Florida [4] provide families with greater control over education—something more and more parents are expressing they want.

Social promotion is becoming less popular. In North Carolina, legislators approved a measure to end social promotion [5]. Rather than automatically passing students on to the next grade, all third-grade students will be required to read at grade level before advancing to the fourth grade. Other states that have implemented this policy suggest that it is helpful in boosting student achievement.

Online,customized learning is on the rise. Individualized online learning options [6] allow more emphasis on areas where students are struggling, without holding back their peers who may be ready for the next level.

Teachers union membership is declining. The National Education Association is projecting a loss of 308,000 members since 2010. One of the union’s top officials, treasurer Becky Pringle, blames “stupid [7]” education reform: “We’re living with a recession that just won’t end, political attacks that have turned brutal, and societal changes that are impacting us—from stupid education ‘reform’ to an explosion of technology—all coming together to impact us in ways that we had never anticipated.”

The Bad >
The Administration is singling out minority students for government “help” instead of raising them up through increased options. Over the summer, President Obama signed an executive order to form the new White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans. According to the White House, the new initiative, which will work across federal agencies, “aims to ensure that all African American students receive an education that fully prepares them for high school graduation, college completion, and productive careers.”

Parents and taxpayers would be correct to be skeptical of a new Washington initiative to improve student outcomes. A new evaluation by Matthew Chingos of the Brookings Institution and Paul Peterson of Harvard shows a far more promising route [8] to improving academic opportunity for the students the President’s initiative aims to help: school vouchers. The study of low-income students in New York City found a 24 percent increase in college enrollment among African-American students who were awarded and used vouchers to attend private schools.

This success has already proven the vital role of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program. Students who have used vouchers to attend private schools in the nation’s capital have a 91 percent graduation rate, while graduation rates in D.C. public schools hover around 60 percent.

The Ugly >
Average per-pupil spending in public schools is reaching historic highs. Nationally, average per-pupil spending exceeds $11,400 this year, meaning a child entering kindergarten today can expect to have no less than $148,000 spent on his or her education by the time the child graduates high school. In all, more than $570 billion will be spent on public K-12 education this year.

Continual increases in the money spent per child and in overall spending haven’t led to increases in academic achievement. Heritage’s Lindsey Burke notes [7]:"We continue to fund institutions—sending that money to schools—instead of actually funding children. Imagine if a child could put those dollars in a funding “backpack” and take that $11,400 to any school—public, private, or virtual. As in every other sector of American life, we would likely see outcomes improve as a result of competitive pressure placed on the government school system."

Despite the successes of more individualized learning and school choice, the Obama Administration wants to further centralize education in Washington through national standards and tests. It has been trying to entice states with waivers from the onerous No Child Left Behind law, which it gives to states that agree to adopt the Administration’s standards instead.

Implementing Washington-controlled education standards means that states, local school boards, and ultimately parents will have less say in their children’s education [9]. This year’s homework assignment for conservatives: continue the fight for increased parental control, individualized options for students, and decreased government interference in education.

[bold and italics emphasis MINE]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org; URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/09/04/morning-bell-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-a-new-school-year/

URLs in this post:
[1] jumped: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/08/22/back-to-school-support-for-school-choice-reaches-all-time-high/
[2] education savings accounts implemented in Arizona: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/04/continuing-the-school-choice-march-policies-to-promote-family-k-12-education-investment
[3] in effect in Louisiana: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/14/louisiana-teachers-cancel-class-to-lobby-against-jindal-reforms/
[4] tuition tax credits benefitting children in Florida: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/09/closing-the-racial-achievement-gap-learning-from-floridas-reforms
[5] end social promotion: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/08/13/back-to-school-education-reform-in-north-carolina/
[6] Individualized online learning options: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/08/20/back-to-school-the-rise-of-customized-education/
[7] stupid: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/08/27/back-to-school-some-surprising-education-numbers/
[8] far more promising route: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/08/23/back-to-school-how-can-we-truly-help-minority-students/
[9] will have less say in their children’s education: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/05/why-national-standards-won-t-fix-american-education-misalignment-of-power-and-incentives

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Putting the Punch in Parent Power
September 10, 2012; http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=22339&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DPD
Source: Frederick M. Hess and Daniel K. Lautzenheiser, "Putting the Punch in Parent Power," American Enterprise Institute, August 29, 2012.

"For too long politics has been entrenched in decisions about education. Teacher unions, with their strong mobilization and organization have long been able to influence elections. This is why union-endorsed incumbents have a 92 percent rate of reelection. Advocacy organizations are seeking to inject a parent's voice into debates about reform to make meaningful influences on policymakers."

No comments:

Post a Comment