Same -Sex "Marriage"- PLEASE PRAY WITH ME (every day untill the decision is revealed around mid-June) THAT THE SUPREME COURT WILL VOTE TO UPHOLD THE 2 LAWS REVIEWED SUPPORTING A TRADITIONAL DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.. PRAY that the Court will resist any pressure to MAKE new law based on "cultural trends." PRAY as though the very future of the institution of the family is at stake because it is. PRAY! - for the sake of possibly millions of children, and for our country if it is to continue to be shown any more favor by our Heavenly Father, who I promise you will be very displeased if homosexual marriage is legalized; "GOD IS NOT [TO BE] MOCKED..." - (Gal. 6:7) - Stan [Be sure to check out my brief essay at post #478.] SPECIAL NOTE: This week's message of "Truth That Transforms" - to be found at (www.truthinaction.org) speaks of the Biblical basis for marriage and the threat posed to the oldest of institutions in society by the so-called same-sex "marraige" effort. It also includes a feature that looks at the problem of fatherless homes in America. Don’t miss another great broadcast!
PASTOR SAEED (Iranian-born AMERICAN pastor) who months ago started an 8 year sentence for helping the underground churches in Iran)// LATEST Update: 'Pastor Saeed Abedini ’Glowing With Joy,’ Prayers Making a Difference, Says Report ," May 15, 2013) http://www.presidentialprayerteam.com/Prayerwatch?pw=1434 \ [NOTE: I find it interesting that just recently in my prayers, I felt led by God to pray that Pastor Saeed would experience JOY during his incarceration. It felt like a stretch but I obeyed. Is it a coincidence that I read Psalm 16 yesterday that says in v.11 which says "...you will fill me with JOY (my emphasis) in your presence,.."? No, it would to have been a God-thing. - Stan]
"More good news concerning U.S. Pastor Saeed Abedini has followed his release from solitary confinement last week, as reports have suggested the global support he has been receiving while in prison in Tehran, Iran, are helping him find joy and peace. Despite his suffering, Pastor Saeed’s faith continues to keep him alive.Other prisoners reportedly told Saeed’s family that when Pastor Saeed was released from solitary confinement, ’he was glowing,’ and that miraculously he ’was filled with more joy and peace after solitary’ than he was before solitary," the American Center for Law and Justice said in a statement."His release from solitary is a direct result of the multitudes praying," said the pastor’s wife, Naghmeh Abedini. "I am relieved my husband is out of solitary, but still am deeply concerned about Saeed’s health. While this is a small victory, I am still demanding justice be done and that Saeed be released." She added in the latest update that her husband’s improved spirits are due to the thousands of people around the world who continue to pray for him." (Sources: Christian Post, Global Dispatch)
PRAY that Pastor Saeed might finally receive the medical treatment he needs. PRAY that God would reveal himself to the pastor's tormenters and turn them to Christ. PRAY that his family, esp. his children, will experience His strength and special presence during this time. And finally, PRAY that , when God has accomplished His will in Pastor Abedini's suffering, he will finally be released 2) More than 550,000 people from 180 countries have signed the petition to Save Saeed. Your voice has moved the U.S., the European Union, and many others to call for his release. If you have not already, please join over 500,000! who have signed the petition for Pastor Saeed's release and tell your friends about it. http://aclj.org/iran/save-american-pastor-from-iranian-prison-sentence ALSO, go to Save Saeed.org and add your name to those sending letters to him.
Last Monday, a Philadelphia jury found abortionist Kermit Gosnell guilty on three counts of first-degree murder, one count of manslaughter and literally hundreds of lesser charges. The verdict came after nearly two months of testimony that described, in what the Washington Post called “gruesome detail,” the inhumanity and brutality of what can and does happen in American abortion clinics. It also exposed the incoherence of the legal, moral, and philosophical reasoning underlying the abortion regime.
Gosnell avoided a possible death sentencing by forgoing his right of appeal in exchange for life sentences.
The reactions to the verdicts ranged from the sublime to the ridiculous: Representative Chris Smith of New Jersey said that “some abortionists may have cleaner sheets than Gosnell, and better sterilized equipment and better trained accomplices, but what they do . . . is the same.” For its part, Planned Parenthood praised the verdict and then bizarrely cited the Gosnell case as a reason to “reject misguided laws that would limit women’s options and force them to seek treatment from criminals like Kermit Gosnell.” Huh? Gosnell is a criminal, but his crimes did not include running an illegal abortion clinic.
By far, the best reaction to the verdict came from Chuck Colson’s friend, Princeton Professor Robert George. Writing for First Things, George called Gosnell a “front man” and added that “the real trial has only just begun.” In that trial, “the defendant is the abortion license in America.” Among the many offenses of the “abortion license in America” is its incoherence and arbitrariness. Gosnell faced the death penalty for actions which, if they had been performed weeks or even minutes earlier, might not have even been a criminal offense.
As George wrote, “Something as morally arbitrary as a human being’s location — his or her being in or out of the womb — cannot determine whether killing him or her is an unconscionable act of premeditated homicide or the exercise of a fundamental liberty.” Yet that is precisely what the “abortion license” dictates. George asks, “If we are to condemn snipping the neck of a child delivered at, say, twenty-four or twenty-six weeks to kill him or her, how can we defend dismembering or poisoning a child in the womb at twenty-six, thirty, or even thirty-four weeks?” The answer is, of course, we can’t, at least not with any intellectual or moral integrity.
For all of his excesses – to put it charitably – George’s colleague at Princeton, pro-abortion philosopher Peter Singer, is at least consistent with his anti-human views and avoids the kind of arbitrary distinctions that pro-abortion groups cling to.Singer denies George’s claim that human beings “are bearers of inviolable dignity and a basic right to life in virtue of our humanity, and not in virtue of accidental qualities such as age, size, or stage of development or condition of dependency.”
But advocates of the “abortion license” want to have it both ways. They affirm the inviolable dignity of human beings, but when it comes to babies in utero, only if it doesn’t conflict with the mother’s so-called “fundamental liberty.” They do this by “[pretending] that abortion and infanticide are radically different acts or practices.” But as the past two months in a Philadelphia court room have amply demonstrated, they are not.
When the difference between life and death for both the victims and their killers is a matter of inches, then the only radical thing about the distinction being made is its departure from reason and simple decency.
[bold and italics emphasis mine]
No comments:
Post a Comment